The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean
Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028 · Cited by 630
Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning
Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00179-5 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 · Cited by 965
Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018 · Cited by 367
An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195 · Cited by 215
Verma, P., Kumar, V., Mittal, A., Rathore, B., Jha, A., & Rahman, M. S. (2023) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-02-2021-0062 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-67
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032711326
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
- The paper
- Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
