Evaluating multiple classifiers for stock price direction prediction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study focuses on support vector machines and artificial neural networks because they are the two methods predominantly used in the machine learning literature on financial time series forecasting.
“However, we focus on the two methods predominantly used in the ML literature on financial time series forecasting, SVM and ANN (Ballings, Van den Poel, Hespeels, & Gryp, 2015).”
From Bridging the divide in financial market forecasting: machine learners vs. financial economists (2016) · cites this paper as Ballings, Van den Poel, Hespeels, & Gryp, 2015
Most previous studies on ensemble methods for stock-market prediction only ensemble a specific type of classifier or regressor, such as neural networks, decision trees, or support vector machines.
“Despite numerous works revealing the dominance of ensemble classifier over single classifier, most of these studies only ensemble a specific type of classifier or regressor for stock-market prediction, such as NN [18][19][20], DT [21,22] and SVM [12,23].”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Most previous studies on ensemble methods for stock-market predictions adopted the decrease variance approach (boosting or bagging) and experimented with data from one country.
“Also, most previous studies [12,19,21,22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30], on ensemble methods for stock-market predictions adopted the decrease variance approach (boosting or bagging) and experimented with data from one country.”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The performance of ensemble methods depends on the domain of the dataset used for the study.
“Nevertheless, the study concluded that the performance of ensemble methods is dependent on the domain of the dataset used for the study.”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
A comparison between bagging (BAG) and boosting (BOT) combination techniques by [12,21] revealed that the BAG technique outperformed the BOT technique.
“Furthermore, a comparison between bagging (BAG) and boosting (BOT) combination techniques by [12,21] revealed that the BAG technique outperformed the BOT technique.”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Most existing studies compared ensemble classifiers or ensemble regressors, but not both.
“most of the studies compared between ensemble classifiers [12, 18-20, 22, 23, 28] or regressors [21,30] machine learning algorithms, but not both.”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The variation in accuracy by classifier ensembles over different datasets shows that the accuracy of ensemble methods in stock-market prediction is dependent on the origin of the data being analysed.
“The variation in accuracy by classifier ensembles over different dataset shows that the accuracy of ensemble methods in stockmarket prediction is dependent on the origin of the data being analysed, which affirms literature [12,21].”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538 · see citing works
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · see citing works
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731 · see citing works
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466 · see citing works
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408 · see citing works
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005 · see citing works
A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Friedman, M. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731944 · Cited by 2,785 · see citing works
The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics
Malkiel, B. G. (2003) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533003321164958 · Cited by 2,161 · see citing works
The profitability of technical trading rules in the Asian stock markets
Bessembinder, H., & Chan, K. (1995) · Pacific-Basin Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/0927-538x(95)00002-3 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Using support vector machine with a hybrid feature selection method to the stock trend prediction
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.038 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Automated trading with performance weighted random forests and seasonality
Booth, A., Gerding, E., & McGroarty, F. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.009 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of fundamental and technical analysis of stock market predictions
Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09754-z · Cited by 547 · see citing works
An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms
Zhang, C., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Almpanidis, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.003 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction
Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00299-5 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting
Barra, S., Carta, S. M., Corriga, A., Podda, A. S., & Recupero, D. R. (2020) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2020.1003132 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Sonkavde, G., Dharrao, D. S., Bongale, A. M., Deokate, S. T., Doreswamy, D., & Bhat, S. K. (2023) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs11030094 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
“The performance of the SVM algorithm can be elevated by tuning parameters such as regularization, gamma, and kernel parameters (Bustos et al. 2017).”
MethodInfluentialBridging the divide in financial market forecasting: machine learners vs. financial economists
Hsu, M.-W., Lessmann, S., Sung, M.-C., Ma, T., & Johnson, J. E. V. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.033 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
A Random Forests Approach to Predicting Clean Energy Stock Prices
Sadorsky, P. (2021) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14020048 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Stock Market Prediction with High Accuracy using Machine Learning Techniques
Bansal, M., Goyal, A., & Choudhary, A. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.028 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Stock-Price Forecasting Based on XGBoost and LSTM
Hoang Vuong, P., Tan Dat, T., Khoi Mai, T., Hoang Uyen, P., & The Bao, P. (2022) · Computer Systems Science and Engineering · doi:10.32604/csse.2022.017685 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Random Forest Based Feature Selection of Macroeconomic Variables for Stock Market Prediction
Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2019) · American Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3844/ajassp.2019.200.212 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mastering Stock Markets with Efficient Mixture of Diversified Trading Experts
Sun, S., Wang, X., Xue, W., Lou, X., & An, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599424 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ballings, M., Van den Poel, D., Hespeels, N., & Gryp, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Ballings, Michel
- ORCID
- Ballings, Michel
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7046-7056
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W333233685
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 21.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- stock trend prediction, ensemble methods, random forest, AdaBoost, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, classifier benchmarking, European listed companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review