Cited by 611Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesForecasting Techniques and Applications

Evaluating multiple classifiers for stock price direction prediction

Ballings, Michel, Van den Poel, Dirk, Hespeels, Nathalie, Gryp, Ruben·2015·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.013

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study focuses on support vector machines and artificial neural networks because they are the two methods predominantly used in the machine learning literature on financial time series forecasting.

    “However, we focus on the two methods predominantly used in the ML literature on financial time series forecasting, SVM and ANN (Ballings, Van den Poel, Hespeels, & Gryp, 2015).”

    From Bridging the divide in financial market forecasting: machine learners vs. financial economists (2016) · cites this paper as Ballings, Van den Poel, Hespeels, & Gryp, 2015

  • Most previous studies on ensemble methods for stock-market prediction only ensemble a specific type of classifier or regressor, such as neural networks, decision trees, or support vector machines.

    “Despite numerous works revealing the dominance of ensemble classifier over single classifier, most of these studies only ensemble a specific type of classifier or regressor for stock-market prediction, such as NN [18][19][20], DT [21,22] and SVM [12,23].”
  • Most previous studies on ensemble methods for stock-market predictions adopted the decrease variance approach (boosting or bagging) and experimented with data from one country.

    “Also, most previous studies [12,19,21,22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30], on ensemble methods for stock-market predictions adopted the decrease variance approach (boosting or bagging) and experimented with data from one country.”
  • The performance of ensemble methods depends on the domain of the dataset used for the study.

    “Nevertheless, the study concluded that the performance of ensemble methods is dependent on the domain of the dataset used for the study.”
  • A comparison between bagging (BAG) and boosting (BOT) combination techniques by [12,21] revealed that the BAG technique outperformed the BOT technique.

    “Furthermore, a comparison between bagging (BAG) and boosting (BOT) combination techniques by [12,21] revealed that the BAG technique outperformed the BOT technique.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballings, M., Van den Poel, D., Hespeels, N., & Gryp, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Ballings, Michel
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
42
Issue
20
Pages
7046-7056
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W333233685
Cited by
611
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
stock trend prediction, ensemble methods, random forest, AdaBoost, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, classifier benchmarking, European listed companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review