Cited by 66Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Multi-Criteria Decision MakingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Evidential reasoning for preprocessing uncertain categorical data for trustworthy decisions: An application on healthcare and finance

Sachan, Swati, Almaghrabi, Fatima, Yang, Jian-Bo, Xu, Dong-Ling·2021·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115597

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An organisation possessing such an AI would have the power to stump their entire competition, becoming a monopoly by controlling their and other's assets.

    “An organisation possessing this would hence have the power to stump their entire competition, becoming a monopoly by just controlling their and other's assets [25].”
  • This reliance is a case of giving more power into AI's hands.

    “This reliance is also a case of giving more power into AI's hands [25].”
  • Having a thorough understanding of and familiarity with a system is one of the most crucial elements in building trust.

    “having a thorough understanding of and familiarity with the system is one of the most crucial elements in building trust [24], [25].”
  • Several businesses also leverage ML in trading cost and implementation, credit risk analysis, and traditional insurance costing and screening.

    “Several businesses also leverage ML in trading cost and implementation, credit risk analysis, and traditional insurance costing and screening [25], [77].”
  • ML has been most widely employed across client-facing operations in addition to anti-money laundering and anomaly detection.

    “ML has been most widely employed across client-facing operations (including advertising and client support) in addition to anti-money laundering and anomaly detection.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachan, S., Almaghrabi, F., Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Sachan, Swati
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
185
Pages
115597
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3186595859
Cited by
66
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Manchester (AA15032)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
evidential reasoning, categorical data, missing data imputation, uncertainty management, trustworthy AI, explainability, expert preferences, reliability weighting, health care, finance, data preprocessing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review