Cited by 41Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesMachine Learning and Data Classification

AcME - accelerated model-agnostic explanations: fast whitening of the machine-learning black box

Dandolo, David, Masiero, Chiara, Carletti, Mattia, Dalle Pezze, Davide, Susto, Gian Antonio·2023·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119115

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dandolo, D., Masiero, C., Carletti, M., Dalle Pezze, D., & Susto, G. A.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Susto, Gian Antonio
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
214
Pages
119115
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307957243
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Regione del Veneto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
model-agnostic interpretability, feature importance, feature ranking, what-if analysis, SHAP, tabular data, regression models, classification models, explainable AI, decision support system, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review