Cited by 81Blockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySustainable Supply Chain ManagementMulti-Criteria Decision Making

Evaluation of blockchain implementation solutions in the sustainable supply chain: A novel hybrid decision approach based on Z-numbers

Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin, Amiri, Maghsoud·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121123

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M.
Affiliations
Allameh Tabataba'i University (IR)
Corresponding author
Amiri, Maghsoud
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
235
Pages
121123
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385739841
Cited by
81
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 5
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
blockchain implementation, supply chain sustainability, Z-numbers, SWARA, CoCoSo, hybrid decision-making, agricultural supply chain, Sustainable Development Goals, uncertainty and ambiguity, compromise solution, multi-criteria decision making, blockchain infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review