The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Abstract
Non-blind deblurring is an integral component of blind approaches for removing image blur due to camera shake.Even though learning-based deblurring methods exist, they have been limited to the generative case and are computationally expensive.To this date, manually-defined models are thus most widely used, though limiting the attained restoration quality.We address this gap by proposing a discriminative approach for non-blind deblurring.One key challenge is that the blur kernel in use at test time is not known in advance.To address this, we analyze existing approaches that use half-quadratic regularization.From this analysis, we derive a discriminative model cascade for image deblurring.Our cascade model consists of a Gaussian CRF at each stage, based on the recently introduced regression tree fields.We train our model by loss minimization and use synthetically generated blur kernels to generate training data.Our experiments show that the proposed approach is efficient and yields state-of-the-art restoration quality on images corrupted with synthetic and real blur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration*
Richardson, W. H. (1972) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.62.000055 · Cited by 4,160
An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions
Lucy, L. B. (1974) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/111605 · Cited by 3,866
Cited by
Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks
Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011 · Cited by 2,665
Deep Learning in Drug Discovery
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201501008 · Cited by 723
Wang, G., Li, W., Aertsen, M., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., & Vercauteren, T. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103 · Cited by 659
A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18 F-FDG PET of the Brain
Ding, Y., Sohn, J. H., Kawczynski, M. G., Trivedi, H., Harnish, R., Jenkins, N. W., Lituiev, D., Copeland, T. P., Aboian, M. S., Mari Aparici, C., et al. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180958 · Cited by 577
RA-UNet: A Hybrid Deep Attention-Aware Network to Extract Liver and Tumor in CT Scans
Jin, Q., Meng, Z., Sun, C., Cui, H., & Su, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.605132 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W4249914127
- Cited by
- 1,774
- References
- 3
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr20399.2014
- The paper
- 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr20399.2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.