Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

·2014

Abstract

Non-blind deblurring is an integral component of blind approaches for removing image blur due to camera shake.Even though learning-based deblurring methods exist, they have been limited to the generative case and are computationally expensive.To this date, manually-defined models are thus most widely used, though limiting the attained restoration quality.We address this gap by proposing a discriminative approach for non-blind deblurring.One key challenge is that the blur kernel in use at test time is not known in advance.To address this, we analyze existing approaches that use half-quadratic regularization.From this analysis, we derive a discriminative model cascade for image deblurring.Our cascade model consists of a Gaussian CRF at each stage, based on the recently introduced regression tree fields.We train our model by loss minimization and use synthetically generated blur kernels to generate training data.Our experiments show that the proposed approach is efficient and yields state-of-the-art restoration quality on images corrupted with synthetic and real blur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr20399.2014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,774

Metadata

Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014
OpenAlex
W4249914127
Cited by
1,774
References
3
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr20399.2014
The paper
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr20399.2014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.