Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following existing studies, we included covariates that potentially influence TaskRabbit entry and local housekeeping employment.
“Following existing studies on local employment and online gig platforms (e.g., Berger et al. 2018), we included several groups of covariates that potentially influence TaskRabbit entry and local housekeeping employment.”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Berger et al. 2018
Online gig platforms are more likely to enter cities with large populations.
“Online gig platforms are more likely to enter cities with a large population (Berger et al. 2018).”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Berger et al. 2018
London cab drivers train for years to memorize all the streets of London, but smartphone navigation apps have made this hard-earned expertise technologically obsolete and economically superfluous.
“London cab drivers, for example, train for years to memorize all the streets of London (Brown, 2011;Lydall, 2023)-but smartphone navigation apps have made this hard-earned expertise technologically obsolete and economically superfluous (Berger et al., 2018).”
From Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs (2024) · cites this paper as Berger et al., 2018
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘Gig Economy’
Berger, T., Frey, C. B., Levin, G., & Danda, S. R. (2019) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/epolic/eiz007 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationApplying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?
(2019) · OECD Economics Department Working Papers · doi:10.1787/fdb0570b-en · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment
Guo, X., Cheng, Z. (., & Pavlou, P. A. (2025) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.0307 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berger, T., Chen, C., & Frey, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Frey, Carl Benedikt
- Venue
- European Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 197-210
- ISSN
- 0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809584719
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 65.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Keywords
- Uber, gig economy, taxi drivers, job displacement, earnings decline, labor supply, platform competition, incumbent workers, labor market disruption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
