Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the impact of online gig platforms like TaskRabbit on the employment of incumbent service workers, focusing on the housekeeping sector. It highlights how TaskRabbit’s entry correlates with a decrease in middle-skilled roles such as supervisors due to automation, whereas low-skilled jobs like janitors remain stable because of their manual nature. Notably, many middle-skilled workers transition to self-employment within the sector instead of facing layoffs. Amidst competing narratives about the gig economy’s influence on labor markets, this research offers critical insights into how gig platforms redistribute the workforce and create new employment opportunities, suggesting significant implications for policymakers and practitioners. Policymakers should recognize the shift from traditional roles to self-employment facilitated by these platforms, which enhances local entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, it is crucial for them to ensure fair working conditions, wages, and benefits. Practitioners can see that gig platforms not only improve operational efficiency but also enable middle-skilled workers to launch their own businesses, indicating a potential strategy for new platforms looking to increase their service offerings and client base. Traditional companies, in response, need to adapt their job designs, incentive structures, and company culture to align with the changing needs for flexibility and autonomy in the gig economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
23 of 94 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductown data
Estimates from a heterogeneity-robust difference-in-differences model and the Generalized Synthetic Control method corroborate the baseline results.
“Both estimates corroborate our baseline results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Callaway and Sant'Anna 2021 source
- cites Xu 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Online gig platforms are more efficient than traditional housekeeping businesses in matching and supervision processes.
“First, online gig platforms exhibit enhanced efficiency compared to traditional housekeeping businesses in facilitating key functions, such as matching and supervision processes (e.g., Cramer andKrueger 2016, Einav et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Cramer andKrueger 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Einav et al. 2016 source
The Introduction says peer-to-peer platforms use technology to improve matching and feedback to monitor quality, and identifies household-task platforms that compete with traditional firms. It does not establish that these platforms are more efficient than traditional housekeeping businesses at either matching or supervision. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
For prospective business owners, online gig platforms help mitigate risks by reducing operational and marketing challenges through efficient matching algorithms and access to an established client base.
“Meanwhile, for prospective business owners, although starting a new business carries inherent risks, online gig platforms help mitigate these risks by significantly reducing operational and marketing challenges through efficient matching algorithms and by providing access to an established client base (Einav et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Einav et al. 2016 source
The Introduction says peer-to-peer markets lower sellers’ entry costs, improve buyer–seller matching, and reduce the cost of advertising to buyers. Section 2.1 also describes how centralized matching can keep transaction costs low. The paper does not specifically say platforms provide prospective business owners with an established client base or establish the claimed degree of risk reduction. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Many low-skilled workers prefer occasional gig work to supplement income.
“Hence, many low-skilled workers prefer occasional gig work to supplement income.11”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] 11. Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? Journal of Financial Economics 144(2):370-395. source
The Introduction and Conclusion discuss biases in staggered difference-in-differences estimates, not workers’ preferences. Searches for low-skilled workers, occasional gig work, and supplemental income found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductown data
The Callaway and Sant'Anna estimator produced estimates consistent with the baseline results, supporting the main findings on TaskRabbit entry's employment effects.
“The analysis using Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) shows consistent estimates with our baseline results, supporting our main findings on the employment effects of TaskRabbit entry (Table D10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) source
- Premisecitation
The standard DiD model can produce biased estimates when treatment timing is staggered.
“Recent studies have suggested that the standard DiD model may lead to a biased estimation with staggered treatment timing (Baker et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker et al. 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Standard DiD models can yield biased estimates with staggered treatment timing and dynamic treatment effects.
“Recent studies have suggested that the standard DiD model may lead to a biased estimation when the treatment happens at different time periods by comparing the earlier adopters with the late adopters (Goodman-Bacon 2021, Baker et al. 2022) when there exist dynamic treatment effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
Heterogeneous treatment effects do not significantly bias the baseline estimates.
“This suggests that the potential for heterogeneous treatment effects does not significantly bias our baseline estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker et al. 2022 source
The paper’s simulations in Sections 3.1.1–3.1.3 show that heterogeneous treatment effects can bias staggered difference-in-differences estimates, sometimes substantially. They do not examine the citing authors’ baseline estimates, so they cannot establish whether those particular estimates are significantly biased. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Using CEM improves estimation by reducing covariate imbalance between treated and control groups.
“To remedy this, we use Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to improve the estimation by reducing the imbalance in covariates between treated and control groups (Blackwell et al. 2009, Iacus et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry has no statistically significant effect on the number of incumbent low-skilled housekeeping workers.
“Specifically, there is a statistically significant decrease in the number of incumbent middle-skilled workers (e.g., first-line managers, supervisors) after TaskRabbit entry, while the number of incumbent lowskilled workers (e.g., janitors, cleaners) remains steady (statistically insignificant) over the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After TaskRabbit entry, incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers move toward self-employment in the housekeeping industry.
“Using data on individual-level employment status and MSA-level business establishments, we observe a statistically significant movement of incumbent middle-skilled workers toward self-employment in the housekeeping industry, following TaskRabbit entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit expanded to more than 40 U.S. cities between 2008 and 2018.
“Since its inception in 2008, TaskRabbit has gradually expanded and operated in more than 40 cities by 2018.”
- Also stated in: § 2.2. Focal Online Gig Platform: TaskRabbit · plain
“The platform has progressively expanded its services to more than 40 U.S. cities from 2008 to 2018 (See details in Tables A1 and A2 in Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 2.2. Focal Online Gig Platform: TaskRabbit · plain
- Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry is associated with a significant decrease in incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers becoming unemployed.
“Besides, there is a significant decrease in incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers becoming unemployed, and no significant effect on employment in other skill-related occupations over the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry has no statistically significant effect on average annual wages of incumbent housekeeping workers.
“We do not find statistically significant effects on average annual wages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry has no significant effect on employment in other skill-related occupations over the same period.
“Besides, there is a significant decrease in incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers becoming unemployed, and no significant effect on employment in other skill-related occupations over the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry is associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers.
“Specifically, there is a statistically significant decrease in the number of incumbent middle-skilled workers (e.g., first-line managers, supervisors) after TaskRabbit entry, while the number of incumbent lowskilled workers (e.g., janitors, cleaners) remains steady (statistically insignificant) over the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in self-employment after TaskRabbit entry is mainly in incorporated self-employment rather than unincorporated self-employment.
“Interestingly, the rise in self-employment primarily falls under the incorporated self-employment category, representing entrepreneurs who start their own businesses, as opposed to the unincorporated self-employment category, representing freelancers and independent contractors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry is associated with a 7.1% decrease in the number of incumbent housekeeping workers in locations where it operated, compared with locations where it did not enter.
“We observe a disproportionate decrease (-7.1%, p<0.001) in the number of incumbent housekeeping workers in locations where TaskRabbit has operated, compared to locations where TaskRabbit did not enter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry is associated with a 7.1% decline in the number of incumbent housekeeping workers (p < 0.001).
“In Column 1, we find that the TaskRabbit entry is statistically significantly associated with a decline in the number of incumbent workers by 7.1% (=100 × (𝑒 *+.+-( -1)%, p < 0.001), 23 suggesting that online gig platform entry reduces the supply of incumbent workers in housekeeping occupations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of TaskRabbit entry on low-skilled workers is statistically insignificant (p = 0.215).
“As seen, the effect on low-skilled workers is statistically insignificant (p = 0.215 > 0.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No evidence suggests TaskRabbit entry affects wages of incumbent workers across skill levels.
“Yet, no evidence suggests that TaskRabbit entry affects the wages of incumbent workers across skill levels (Columns 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The decline translates to approximately 1,175 fewer incumbent workers per occupation per year in each MSA after TaskRabbit entry.
“This translates into a reduction of approximately 1,175 incumbent workers per occupation and per year in each MSA following the entry of TaskRabbit.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry has no statistically significant effect on incumbent housekeeping workers' wages.
“Yet, the effects of TaskRabbit on wages are not statistically significant (Column 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Workers employed by small companies are significantly more likely to leave their companies following TaskRabbit entry compared to workers in large firms.
“We found that workers employed by small companies are indeed significantly more likely to leave their companies, following TaskRabbit entry, compared to workers in large firms (Table E1, Appendix E), supporting our hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Generalized synthetic control estimates showed that TaskRabbit entry had a negative and statistically significant effect on the number of housekeeping managers, the middle-skilled group (beta = -0.146, p < 0.01).
“Results indicate that the effect of TaskRabbit entry on the number of housekeeping managers (middle-skilled workers) is negative and statistically significant (𝛽 = -0.146,p < 0.01), whereas that for low-skilled workers is not significant (p = 0.48 > 0.1) (Table D11, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The empirical evidence supports only the self-employment explanation for labor redistribution.
“Interestingly, our empirical evidence only supports the “self-employment” explanation, and the self-employment redistribution is mainly driven by the observed transition of incumbent middle-skilled workers toward becoming small business owners (incorporated and entrepreneurial roles), instead of becoming freelancers or independent workers (unincorporated roles).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No evidence suggests movement between housekeeping occupations and skill-related non-housekeeping occupations.
“As seen, no evidence suggests such a movement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry lowers probability of middle-skilled workers transitioning from work-for-wages to unemployment by 2.9% (p<0.05).
“For middle-skilled workers (in Panel A), Column 1 shows that TaskRabbit entry statistically significantly lowers the probability of their transition from work-for-wages employment to unemployment status (i.e., -2.9% = 100 × (𝑒 *+.+&/ -1)%, p < 0.05), while Column 2 shows no significant evidence of them moving to other skill-related (but non-housekeeping) occupations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in housekeeping establishments is mainly driven by small-sized establishments with fewer than 50 employees, not larger establishments.
“More importantly, the increase is mainly driven by the significant increase in small-sized establishments with employment sizes smaller than 50 (Columns 2-5), rather than larger establishments with employees larger than 50 (Columns 6-9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study finds a significant decline in employment of incumbent middle-skilled workers relative to low-skilled workers, who mainly perform matching and supervising tasks, following gig platform entry.
“We find a significant decline in the employment of incumbent middle-skilled (relative to low-skilled) workers, who mainly perform matching/supervising tasks, following gig platform entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry effect on number and wages of low-skilled workers is statistically insignificant.
“Notably, the TaskRabbit entry effect on the number and wages of low-skilled workers is statistically insignificant, suggesting that the supply of incumbent low-skilled workers remains unaffected by the gig platform's entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry significantly reduces working hours for middle-skilled workers.
“Additional analysis shows that TaskRabbit's entry significantly reduces working hours for middle-skilled workers (Table E2, Appendix E), further corroborating its role in improving operational efficiency and reducing reliance on these workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No evidence supports labor movements between middle-skilled and low-skilled housekeeping occupations after TaskRabbit entry.
“However, no evidence supports such labor movements after the TaskRabbit entry (Table C3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study does not find major changes in the earnings of incumbent housekeeping workers following TaskRabbit entry.
“While anecdotal claims attribute unfair competition and suppressed wages to online gig platforms, our study does not find major changes in the earnings of incumbent workers in housekeeping occupations, following TaskRabbit entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Generalized synthetic control estimates showed that TaskRabbit entry's effect on low-skilled workers was not statistically significant (p = 0.48 > 0.1).
“Results indicate that the effect of TaskRabbit entry on the number of housekeeping managers (middle-skilled workers) is negative and statistically significant (𝛽 = -0.146,p < 0.01), whereas that for low-skilled workers is not significant (p = 0.48 > 0.1) (Table D11, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For low-skilled workers, no evidence shows any significant changes in their employment.
“For low-skilled workers (in Panel B), no evidence shows any significant changes in their employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The self-employment redistribution was mainly driven by incumbent middle-skilled workers becoming small business owners in incorporated and entrepreneurial roles, rather than freelancers or independent workers in unincorporated roles.
“Interestingly, our empirical evidence only supports the “self-employment” explanation, and the self-employment redistribution is mainly driven by the observed transition of incumbent middle-skilled workers toward becoming small business owners (incorporated and entrepreneurial roles), instead of becoming freelancers or independent workers (unincorporated roles).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No evidence supports transitions from middle-skilled to low-skilled housekeeping occupations or vice versa.
“Yet, no evidence supports such movements (Tables C3-C6), lending more credence to the self-employment movement of incumbent middle-skilled workers (H3c) as the primary labor redistribution mechanisms to explain the effect of gig platform entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No statistically significant movement from low-skilled wage-based employment to incorporated or unincorporated self-employment is found.
“The results, shown Table C6, indicate no statistically significant movement from low-skilled wage-based employment to either type of selfemployment (i.e., incorporated and unincorporated), failing to support effect (B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The overall decline in housekeeping employment after TaskRabbit entry was mainly driven by a disproportionate decline among incumbent middle-skilled workers.
“Our findings reveal that the overall decrease in housekeeping employment is mainly driven by a disproportionate decline of incumbent middle-skilled workers after TaskRabbit entry, whereas low-skilled workers remain largely unaffected during the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Low-skilled workers remained largely unaffected during the same period after TaskRabbit entry.
“Our findings reveal that the overall decrease in housekeeping employment is mainly driven by a disproportionate decline of incumbent middle-skilled workers after TaskRabbit entry, whereas low-skilled workers remain largely unaffected during the same period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using aggregate MSA-year data, the effects of TaskRabbit entry on overall numbers of workers in unemployment, housekeeping-related jobs, and self-employment remain consistent with individual-level results.
“Beyond estimating employment status changes at the individual worker level, we explored the effects of TaskRabbit entry on the overall number of workers in unemployment, housekeeping-related jobs, and self-employment in the housekeeping industry using aggregate MSA-year level data, and the results remain consistent (Table C7 in Appendix C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is a significant increase in the total number of local housekeeping establishments following TaskRabbit entry.
“From Table 7, we observe a significant increase in the total number of local housekeeping establishments following TaskRabbit entry (Column 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using TaskRabbit's U.S. expansion pattern, the study identifies a statistically significant downward trend in incumbent housekeeping employment after TaskRabbit entry.
“Exploiting the expansion pattern of TaskRabbit across the U.S., we identify a statistically significant downward trend in incumbent housekeeping employment after the online gig platform (TaskRabbit) entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant evidence of middle-skilled workers moving to other skill-related non-housekeeping occupations.
“For middle-skilled workers (in Panel A), Column 1 shows that TaskRabbit entry statistically significantly lowers the probability of their transition from work-for-wages employment to unemployment status (i.e., -2.9% = 100 × (𝑒 *+.+&/ -1)%, p < 0.05), while Column 2 shows no significant evidence of them moving to other skill-related (but non-housekeeping) occupations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Average start-up costs for new cleaning ventures are relatively manageable, with a mean of $3,500.
“The findings, detailed in Tables E3 and E4, reveal that the average start-up costs are relatively manageable (mean of $3,500), and the required skills are generally within the capabilities of middle-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The estimated average yearly decrease in housekeeping workers per treated MSA is about 1,175.
“Multiplying this by the 7.1% reduction rate yields approximately 1,175 workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The treatment effect of TaskRabbit is constant over time.
- Findingown data
The effect of TaskRabbit entry on the number of low-skilled workers is not statistically significant.
“Notably, we observe a statistically significant and persistent downward trend in the number of middle-skilled workers (e.g., managers) after the TaskRabbit entry, while the effect on low-skilled workers (e.g., cleaners) is not significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pre-treatment trends in worker numbers and wages do not differ statistically significantly between treated and untreated MSAs.
“As can be seen, there are no statistically significant differences in the trends of both the number and wage of workers between treated and untreated MSAs in the pre-treatment periods, failing to reject the parallel trends assumption of the DiD estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Average annual wages of housekeeping workers show no significant effects before or after TaskRabbit entry.
“Finally, we find the effects on the average annual wage of housekeeping workers are insignificant before and after TaskRabbit entry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The potential mean number of workers in treated MSA units had TaskRabbit not entered is 16,554.
“we recover the potential mean number of workers in treated MSA units had TaskRabbit not entered, which would be 16,554”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the subsample of housekeeping workers in the building and dwelling industry, TaskRabbit entry has a negative and statistically significant effect on middle-skilled workers' wages.
“Notably, when we narrowed our sample to housekeeping workers within the building and dwelling industry (specifically, the primary industry comprising housekeeping workers directly impacted by TaskRabbit), the effect of TaskRabbit entry on the wages of middle-skilled workers is negative and significant (see TableD17in Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The estimated average decrease in middle-skilled workers per treated unit is about 711.
“a 25.0% (=100 × (𝑒 *+.&66 -1)%) reduction to the mean number of middle-skilled workers, which in turn yields approximately 711 workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The treatment effect of TaskRabbit is constant over time.
- Findingown data
Small-sized housekeeping companies are more likely to be affected by TaskRabbit than large-sized companies.
“The results, presented in Table E1, indicate that small-sized companies are more likely to be affected by TaskRabbit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The negative effect on middle-skilled workers is stronger in MSAs with a larger housekeeping employment share than in those with a smaller share.
“We observe that the negative effects on middle-skilled workers are stronger in MSAs with a larger share of housekeeping employment than in MSAs with a smaller share”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Excluding traveler accommodation workers and focusing on building and dwelling workers yields largely consistent results.
“The results are presented in Tables D17 and D18, and they are largely consistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Low-skilled employment trends remain overlapped before and after TaskRabbit entry.
“However, the trends in low-skilled employment remain overlapped before and after the TaskRabbit Entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The skills required to start new cleaning ventures are generally within the capabilities of middle-skilled workers.
“The findings, detailed in Tables E3 and E4, reveal that the average start-up costs are relatively manageable (mean of $3,500), and the required skills are generally within the capabilities of middle-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Replicating the main analysis with matched MSAs produces a significant negative effect of TaskRabbit entry.
“Results from replicating the main analysis with matched MSAs are in Table D4.A significant negative effect of the TaskRabbit entry remains, alleviating the concerns of the imperfect comparability between treated and untreated MSAs in our baseline DiD estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across all model specifications, the estimated TaskRabbit entry effect on middle-skilled workers falls between -0.146 and -0.448.
“By summarizing the coefficients across all model specifications in our paper, estimates range is from -0.041 to -0.095 for total number of workers and is from -0.146 to -0.448 for middle-skilled workers (see details in TableD23in Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Replicating the main model with only linear MSA-specific time trends yields consistent results.
“we replicated the main model using only the linear MSA specific-time trend. The results are presented in Table D19, and we observe consistent results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After TaskRabbit entry, the number of middle-skilled workers shows a statistically significant and persistent downward trend.
“Notably, we observe a statistically significant and persistent downward trend in the number of middle-skilled workers (e.g., managers) after the TaskRabbit entry, while the effect on low-skilled workers (e.g., cleaners) is not significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across specifications, the estimated TaskRabbit effect on total worker numbers ranges from -0.041 to -0.095.
“the estimates of the impact of TaskRabbit on the total number of workers range from -0.041 to -0.095.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry significantly increases the number of self-employed workers in housekeeping middle-skilled occupations by 6.3% (p < 0.05).
“it significantly increases the number of self-employed workers in the housekeeping middle-skilled occupations by 6.3% (p < 0.05, Column 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
- Findingown data
Across specifications, the estimated TaskRabbit effect on middle-skilled worker numbers ranges from -0.146 to -0.448.
“For middle-skilled workers, the coefficients vary from -0.146 to -0.448.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using the number of platforms entered in MSAs as a proxy for treatment intensity produces patterns similar to and consistent with the main findings.
“we replicated the baseline estimation using the number of platforms entered in MSAs as a proxy for treatment intensity, and we observed similar and consistent patterns with our main findings (Table D16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When the sample is limited to housekeeping workers in the building and dwelling industry, TaskRabbit entry has a negative and statistically significant effect on middle-skilled workers' wages.
“when we narrowed our sample to housekeeping workers within the building and dwelling industry (specifically, the primary industry comprising housekeeping workers directly impacted by TaskRabbit), the effect of TaskRabbit entry on the wages of middle-skilled workers is negative and statistically significantly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Middle-skilled workers at smaller companies are more likely to leave their companies and become self-employed than those at larger companies.
“middle-skilled workers at smaller companies are more likely to leave their companies and become self-employed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across all model specifications, the estimated TaskRabbit entry effect on the total number of workers falls between -0.041 and -0.095.
“By summarizing the coefficients across all model specifications in our paper, estimates range is from -0.041 to -0.095 for total number of workers and is from -0.146 to -0.448 for middle-skilled workers (see details in TableD23in Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TaskRabbit's entry is linked to a 7.1% decrease in the count of housekeeping workers in treated metropolitan statistical areas following treatment.
“First, the coefficient for TaskRabbit indicates that its introduction is associated with a reduction of 7.1% (=100 × (𝑒 *+.+-( -1)%) in the number of housekeeping workers in the treated MSAs after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The treatment effect of TaskRabbit is constant over time.
- Findingown data
TaskRabbit entry significantly lowers working hours for middle-skilled housekeeping workers.
“The results, as detailed in Table E2, show that the entry of TaskRabbit significantly reduces the working hours for middle-skilled housekeeping workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Online gig platforms give freelance workers greater flexibility and autonomy to tailor their work schedules.
“Second, online gig platforms offer greater flexibility and autonomy, allowing freelance workers to tailor their work schedules (e.g., Li et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Service occupations such as housekeeping have been disrupted by the entry of online gig platforms.
“Service occupations, such as housekeeping have experienced disruption from the entry of online gig platforms, and they have been a major focus in the recent literature on technology and labor (e.g., Gatta et al. 2009, Acemoglu andAutor 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gatta et al. 2009 source
- cites Acemoglu andAutor 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Housekeeping is a service occupation that is increasingly affected by technological advances.
“First, housekeeping represents a service occupation increasingly affected by technological advances, garnering significant attention in recent technology and labor studies (Frey and Osborne 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frey and Osborne 2017 source
- Study design and conductown data
The estimated employment effects of TaskRabbit entry remain robust and consistent across different model specifications and samples of MSAs and periods.
“Notably, these effects remain robust and consistent under different model specifications and samples of MSAs and periods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
TaskRabbit requires workers to perform services offline and locally within delimited geographic areas such as MSAs.
“Finally, while the platform matches housekeeping demand and labor supply online, it restricts workers to performing services offline and locally within delimited geographic areas (e.g., MSAs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Online gig platforms have helped move service employment from permanent jobs toward on-demand gig work.
“Online gig platforms have, in the recent decade, facilitated the shift of service employment from permanent employment to on-demand gig work (e.g., Sundararajan 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sundararajan 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Middle-skilled incumbent housekeeping workers are more significantly affected by online gig platform entry than low-skilled workers.
“Taken together, our analyses consistently indicate that middle-skilled incumbent housekeeping workers, relative to low-skilled workers, are more significantly affected by the entry of online gig platforms, such as TaskRabbit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Online gig platforms streamline business operations by automating job matching, scheduling, and supervision.
“Specifically, online gig platforms streamline business operations by automating job matching, scheduling, and supervision processes (e.g., Cramer andKrueger 2016, Horton 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cramer andKrueger 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Horton 2017 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Because TaskRabbit cannot replace hands-on cleaning tasks done by low-skilled workers, demand for these workers is likely to rise.
“In our setting, since TaskRabbit cannot replace the hands-on cleaning tasks performed by low-skilled workers, their demand is likely to rise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
- Interpretationreasoning
These factors may collectively reinforce low-skilled workers' preference for maintaining existing wage-based employment.
“These factors may collectively reinforce their preference for maintaining their existing wage-based employment status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Online gig platforms notably lower barriers to self-employment entry, often requiring minimal prior experience, references, or qualifications to become independent contractors.
“First, online gig platforms notably lower barriers to self-employment entry (Vallas andSchor 2020, Silva andMoreira 2022), often requiring minimal prior experience, references, or qualifications for workers to become independent contractors on online gig platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallas andSchor 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Silva andMoreira 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Frey and Osborne (2017) found that 94% of middle-skilled housekeeping occupations can be computerized.
“Frey and Osborne (2017) show that 94% of middle-skilled housekeeping occupations can be computerized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frey and Osborne (2017) source
- Interpretationreasoning
For middle-skilled workers, TaskRabbit introduction offers viable pathways from wage-based employment to self-employment.
“For middle-skilled workers, the introduction of TaskRabbit offers viable pathways from wage-based employment to self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The nature of low-skilled workers' tasks (labor-intensive manual) and their insufficient managerial, technological, and entrepreneurial experience significantly reduce their likelihood of starting their own companies.
“The nature of tasks typically performed by low-skilled workers, primarily labor-intensive manual tasks, coupled with insufficient managerial and technological skills (see Appendix B) and entrepreneurial experience (Lazear 2004), significantly reduce their likelihood of starting their own companies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lazear 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Online gig platforms make starting businesses a feasible option for middle-skilled workers with supervisory, managerial, and technological skills, enabling them to use these capabilities for entrepreneurial opportunities.
“In addition, online gig platforms also make starting businesses a feasible option for middle-skilled workers possessing supervisory, managerial, and technological skills (see Appendices B and E for details), positioning them to use these capabilities for entrepreneurial opportunities (Fossen and Sorgner 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fossen and Sorgner 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Low-skilled workers may perceive limited incentives to transition from work-for-wages employment to self-employment.
“In contrast, low-skilled workers may perceive limited incentives to transition from work-for-wages employment to becoming self-employed, whether as independent contractors or business owners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
- Interpretationreasoning
Low-skilled workers' tasks are less substitutable by online gig platforms, giving them little incentive to relocate occupations.
“However, the situation differs for low-skilled workers, whose tasks are less substitutable by online gig platforms, which thus offers a scant incentive for them to relocate occupations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
- Interpretationreasoning
The results demonstrate that TaskRabbit introduction mainly substitutes first-line managers and supervisors in local housekeeping occupations.
“In sum, these results demonstrate that the introduction of TaskRabbit mainly substitutes first-line managers and supervisors in local housekeeping occupations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Surveys indicate that low-skilled workers are reluctant to leave their occupations due to concerns over losing employment benefits such as health insurance.
“Despite the flexibility offered by online gig platforms, surveys indicate that low-skilled workers are reluctant to leave their occupations due to concerns over losing employment benefits, such as health insurance.10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] 10. Bai J (2009) Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica 77(4):1229-1279. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Using MSA as the geographic unit better captures the effect of TaskRabbit entry on local employment.
“Using MSA as the geographic unit can better capture the effect of TaskRabbit entry on local employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Replicating the baseline estimation with the number of entering platforms as a treatment-intensity proxy yielded patterns similar to and consistent with the main findings.
“Finally, we replicated the baseline estimation using the number of platforms entering MSAs as a proxy for treatment intensity, yielding similar and consistent patterns with our main findings (Table D16, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Using Thumbtack's Google Trends search intensity as a proxy, the results remained consistent.
“To account for Thumbtack's potential effect, we used its Google Trends search intensity as a proxy, and the results remained consistent (Table D15, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Incumbent middle-skilled workers, rather than low-skilled ones, are more disrupted after gig platform entry.
“In other words, incumbent middle-skilled workers, rather than low-skilled ones, are more disrupted after the gig platform entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
After adding Handy entry to the baseline model, a consistent and significant downward trend in the number of managers remained following both Handy and TaskRabbit entry.
“We still observe a consistent and significant downward trend in the number of managers following both the Handy entry and TaskRabbit entry (Table D14, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A thorough survey helped exclude the effects of many platforms on the estimates, given their size, expansion history, and entry timing.
“A thorough survey helped exclude the effects of many platforms on our estimates, given their size, expansion history, and entry timing (Table D12, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Low-skilled incumbent workers are less affected because their manual and labor-intensive tasks are unlikely to be automated and replaced by online gig platforms, at least in their current form.
“This also explains why low-skilled incumbent workers are less impacted, as their primary tasks (manual and labor-intensive) are unlikely to be automated and replaced by online gig platforms, at least in their current form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This indicates that middle-skilled workers tend to start their own housekeeping startups as entrepreneurs after TaskRabbit entry, rather than working as freelancers or independent workers.
“This indicates that middle-skilled workers (who might have left their work-for-wages employment position) tend to start their own housekeeping startups as entrepreneurs after TaskRabbit entry, rather than working as freelancers or independent workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study cannot measure potential earning changes when incumbent middle-skilled workers shift to self-employment because income reporting methods differ for incumbent and self-employed workers.
“We cannot measure potential earning changes when incumbent middle-skilled workers shift to self-employed due to different income reporting methods for incumbent and self-employed workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Online gig platforms cannot be simplistically characterized as skill-biased against middle-skilled but not low-skilled workers.
“Integrating these empirical insights, our study suggests that online gig platforms cannot be simplistically characterized as skill-biased (against middle-skilled, albeit not low-skilled workers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study's empirical evidence is not based on an ideal randomized controlled trial that randomly assigns TaskRabbit entry locations.
“First, our empirical evidence is not based on an ideal randomized controlled trial that assigns TaskRabbit to enter locations at random.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The cancel-out effect is less likely.
“Given this rationale, we reasonably believe that the cancel-out effect is less likely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Incorporating Handy, a similar and comparable platform, into the analysis produced consistent results.
“We incorporated a similar and comparable platform, Handy, into our analysis and found consistent results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This redistribution encourages local entrepreneurial activities in the form of newly established small businesses.
“This encourages local entrepreneurial activities, albeit in the form of newly-established small businesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Middle-skilled workers whose roles involve matching and supervising are more likely to be affected by online gig platforms than low-skilled workers primarily engaged in manual tasks.
“Specifically, middle-skilled workers, whose roles involve tasks like matching and supervising, are more likely to be affected by these platforms than low-skilled workers primarily engaged in manual tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Middle-skilled workers have the skills needed to perform low-skilled tasks.
“Hence, these middle-skilled workers possess the essential skills to perform the tasks of low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This lends more credence to self-employment movement as primary labor redistribution mechanism.
“Yet, no evidence supports such movements (Tables C3-C6), lending more credence to the self-employment movement of incumbent middle-skilled workers (H3c) as the primary labor redistribution mechanisms to explain the effect of gig platform entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The emergence of online gig platforms such as TaskRabbit redistributes workers from traditional businesses to self-employment.
“Our findings imply that the emergence of online gig platforms, such as TaskRabbit, redistributes workers from traditional businesses to self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This further supports that online gig platforms may not redistribute the incumbent low-skilled labor force.
“This further supports that online gig platforms may not redistribute the incumbent low-skilled labor force.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The estimates were consistently validated through a battery of robustness and falsification tests.
“Importantly, our estimates are consistently validated through a battery of robustness and falsification tests (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Supply of incumbent low-skilled workers remains unaffected by gig platform entry.
“Notably, the TaskRabbit entry effect on the number and wages of low-skilled workers is statistically insignificant, suggesting that the supply of incumbent low-skilled workers remains unaffected by the gig platform's entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The disruptive effect on middle-skilled workers may be due to overlap between their managerial tasks and TaskRabbit functions.
“As theorized in H2a, this effect may be due to the overlap between the tasks of middle-skilled managerial occupationsfoot_21 (i.e., matching housekeeping demand and labor supply, scheduling, and supervising services) and the functions facilitated by TaskRabbit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many middle-skilled managers previously worked as cleaners or janitors and were promoted after several years of experience.
“According to Rauf (2014), many middle-skilled managers were previously cleaners and janitors and later promoted after several years of work experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rauf (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The generalized synthetic control results corroborated the main findings.
“In sum, the GSC results yet again corroborate our main findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Before TaskRabbit entered, treated and untreated metropolitan areas showed no statistically significant differences in pre-entry trends for middle-skilled and low-skilled worker counts.
“As seen, no statistically significant differences exist for the number of middle-skilled and low-skilled workers between treated and untreated MSAs before TaskRabbit entry, supporting the parallel trends assumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This evidence corroborates the Self-employment Effect that incumbent middle-skilled workers are redistributed to local incorporated entrepreneurial activities at a small business scale after gig platform entry.
“Together with Tables 56, this additional evidence of distributional changes in housekeeping businesses further corroborates the Self-employment Effect that incumbent middle-skilled workers are redistributed to engage more in local (incorporated) entrepreneurial activities, albeit at a small business scale, after the entry of gig platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The Table C5 results help alleviate concerns that other services covered by TaskRabbit bias the baseline estimates.
“Table C5 presents the results, indicating any statistically significant movement, which helps to alleviate the concerns that other services covered by TaskRabbit bias our baseline estimates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of wage effect might suggest a decrease in market demand for incumbent middle-skilled workers when TaskRabbit automates part of their managerial tasks.
“This might suggest a decrease in market demand for incumbent middle-skilled workers, when TaskRabbit automates part of their managerial tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Bacon decompositions showed that the negative employment effects were consistent across different control groups.
“Results from Bacon decompositions suggest that the observed negative employment effects are consistent across different control groups (Figure D2 and Table D9 in Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The results suggest that online gig platforms may replace managerial workers whose cognitive tasks overlap with platform algorithmic functions such as matching and supervising.
“These results suggest that online gig platforms may replace managerial workers whose cognitive tasks overlap with the algorithmic functions of the online gig platform, such as matching and supervising services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Replicating the model with MSA-year level data in robustness checks yields consistent results.
“We replicated the model using the MSA-year level data in the robustness checks, and the results are consistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Data constraints prevented observation of wage changes for middle-skilled workers who moved from work-for-wages employment to self-employment.
“Due to data constraints, we could not observe changes in wages for those middle-skilled workers who changed the employment status from work-for-wages employment to self-employment status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Many entrepreneurs develop crucial skills through hands-on experience and subsequent reskilling rather than at the outset of their careers.
“research indicates that many entrepreneurs develop crucial skills, not at the outset of their careers, but rather through hands-on experience and subsequent reskilling (e.g., Cope 2005, Kozlinska et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cope 2005 source
- cites Kozlinska et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Online gig platforms are more likely to enter cities with large populations.
“Online gig platforms are more likely to enter cities with a large population (Berger et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berger et al. 2018 source
- Study design and conductown data
Excluding MSAs that TaskRabbit entered after 2017 yields results consistent with the main results.
“Results are in Table D6 and are consistent with the main results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
- Rests on an assumption: The effect of TaskRabbit entry may take more than one year to fully materialize.
- Interpretationown data
The stronger negative effect in MSAs with larger housekeeping employment shares supports the robustness of the main findings.
“further corroborating the robustness of our main findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The matched-MSA replication reduces concerns about imperfect comparability between treated and untreated MSAs in the baseline DiD.
“Results from replicating the main analysis with matched MSAs are in Table D4.A significant negative effect of the TaskRabbit entry remains, alleviating the concerns of the imperfect comparability between treated and untreated MSAs in our baseline DiD estimation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Entrepreneurial skills are predominantly learned through practice.
“prior studies showed that entrepreneurial skills are predominantly learned by practicing (Iyigun and Owen 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Iyigun and Owen 1998 source
- Study design and conductown data
Excluding data after 2017 yields consistent results.
“We find consistent results (Table D8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
- Rests on an assumption: TaskRabbit was acquired by IKEA in 2017 and subsequently offered additional services that could confound the main results.
- Study design and conductown data
The real DiD estimates for TaskRabbit entry and its interaction are in the left tail of the placebo distribution, above the 95th percentile.
“In addition, comparing the distribution of the pseudo effects of random official TaskRabbit entry, we observe that the real DiD estimate of both the actual TaskRabbit entry effect and the interaction effects is at the left tail of the distribution (higher than the 95% percentile).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Middle-skilled workers are likely to move into entrepreneurial self-employment.
“The above perspectives lend credence to our findings that middle-skilled workers are likely to move to become entrepreneurial self-employed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Gig platform entry redistributes incumbent middle-skilled workers into self-employment.
“The introduction of gig platforms redistributes incumbent middle-skilled workers into self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
GSC results further support the baseline DiD estimates.
“Accordingly, the GSC results further support the baseline DiD estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
- Study design and conductown data
The baseline estimates are not due to spurious statistical significance.
“These results show that our baseline estimates are not due to spurious statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Restricting the sample to the top 50 largest MSAs yields results consistent with the main analysis.
“Results are in Table D7, where we observe consistent results with the main analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
- Interpretationown data
The skills and risks of starting a housekeeping venture are less daunting than often expected in other industries such as tech.
“In conclusion, the skills and risks involved in starting a new venture in housekeeping industry are not so daunting as often expected in other industries (e.g., tech industry).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
TaskRabbit can facilitate middle-skilled managers' shift toward entrepreneurial activities.
“Theoretically, we expanded our arguments on how TaskRabbit can facilitate middle-skilled managers' shift towards entrepreneurial activities”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 71
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 55
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe growth of online gig platforms creates challenges for traditional incumbent industries because these platforms have better matching algorithms, flexible schedules, and lower entry barriers.
“The rise of these gig platforms has brought challenges to traditional, incumbent industries 1 due to their superior matching algorithms (Cramer and Krueger 2016), flexible work schedules (Hall and Krueger 2018), and lower entry barriers (Schwellnus et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAgrawal et al. (2019) suggest that AI may replace occupations involving prediction tasks while complementing occupations requiring decision-related tasks.
“For example, Agrawal et al. (2019) suggest that AI may substitute occupations involving prediction tasks (e.g., forecasting), while complementing occupations requiring decision-related tasks (e.g., strategic planning).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Agrawal et al. 2019 source
The Conclusion says AI can substitute capital for labor in prediction tasks, and the passage on individual workers says it may diminish occupations whose core skill is prediction. It also says prediction and decision tasks are complementary, but the Conclusion cautions that AI may favor either labor or capital in decision tasks. Thus, complementing decision-related occupations is a possibility, not a general outcome established by the paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSBTC theory holds that technological progress complements skilled workers by raising their relative productivity and replaces unskilled workers by automating their tasks.
“The A canonical theory in this discourse is SBTC (Acemoglu 2002, Autor et al. 2003), which posits that technological progress complements skilled workers by boosting their relative productivity and substitutes unskilled workers by automating their tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe widespread availability and affordability of computers has increased demand for high-skilled workers who can use these tools, a pattern known as capital-skill complementarity.
“The ubiquity and affordability of computers have also spurred the demand for high-skilled workers capable of effectively leveraging these tools, a phenomenon known as capital-skill complementarity (e.g., Krusell et al. 2000, Acemoglu 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Krusell et al. 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Acemoglu 2002 source
Section 1.2 cites evidence that the rapid spread of computers increased demand for skills, and Section 5.1 discusses computers as high-tech capital associated with demand for educated workers. But the copy does not establish affordability as a driver; Section 4.2 also cautions that some skill upgrading in computerized industries may reflect an existing trend rather than a direct effect of computers. No page numbers are available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms lower entry barriers for workers and thereby promote self-employment opportunities.
“Third, online gig platforms lower barriers for workers to enter the job market, thus promoting selfemployment opportunities (Vallas and Schor 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vallas and Schor 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms can automatically match clients and workers, streamline transactions, and manage reviews, tasks that overlap with middle-skilled workers' duties.
“Online gig platforms can automatically match clients and housekeeping workers, streamline transactions, and manage reviews (Vallas and Schor 2020), tasks that heavily overlap with the duties of incumbent middle-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vallas and Schor 2020 source
In “ADVENT OF THE PLATFORM REVOLUTION” (page unavailable), the paper describes gig workers engaging with customers through platforms and describes digitally mediated transactions. In “PLATFORMS AND THE SHARING ECONOMY: AN AGENDA FOR RESEARCH” (page unavailable), it discusses customer reviews and ratings. These passages support the general platform functions, but do not establish that platforms automatically match housekeeping workers with clients or streamline their transactions. The statement about middle-skilled workers follows the citation and is not assessed as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms reduce search costs for housekeeping services, which may increase demand for incumbent workers.
“First, gig platforms reduce search costs for housekeeping services (e.g., Goldfarb and Tucker 2019), potentially boosting the demand for incumbent workers (Schwellnus et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Goldfarb and Tucker 2019 source
- cites Schwellnus et al. 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIncumbent workers may move to related occupations in other sectors that require similar skill levels.
“Another option for incumbent workers is to move to related occupations in other sectors that require similar skill levels (Moscarini and Vella 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Moscarini and Vella 2008 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses occupational mobility and gives an example of a worker doing the same tasks in different industries. It does not establish that workers move to related occupations in other sectors requiring similar skill levels; its cross-industry example involves the same occupation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGeneral-purpose technologies typically create new occupations or move workers into other occupations.
“In terms of labor market outcomes, GPTs typically create new occupations (e.g., computer-related) or relocate the workforce to other occupations (e.g., workers in routine roles shifting to more analytic occupations) (Brynjolfsson et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Brynjolfsson et al. 2018 source
The Introduction (p. 3) says AI may bring fundamental changes to work, and §1.1.2 (p. 5) mentions possible new roles for radiologists and pathologists. Neither passage says general-purpose technologies typically create new occupations or move workers from routine to analytic occupations; searches for those occupational shifts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms can provide a stable income source for workers because of lower entry barriers and flexible schedules.
“Prior studies have demonstrated that online gig platforms can serve as a stable income source for workers due to their lower entry barriers and flexible work schedules (e.g., Schor et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Schor et al. 2020 source
The paper describes flexible schedules and says delivery apps can be joined without physical assets or education (A new analytic approach: platform dependence; Variation across the platforms: a vertical hierarchy; page numbers unavailable). But it does not establish that these features provide workers with stable income: it describes platform earnings as precarious, especially for workers who depend on them (Describing our respondents; Variation across the platforms: a vertical hierarchy). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTechnology displaces and reinstates labor.
“This observation is an important empirical support for the recent theoretical work in labor economics, which posits that “technology displaces and reinstates labor” (Acemoglu and Restrepo 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Acemoglu and Restrepo 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStandard DiD estimates can be problematic when earlier adopters are compared with later adopters and when treatment effects are dynamic.
“Studies suggest that the estimations may be problematic when comparing the earlier adopters with the late adopters and when there exists a dynamic treatment effect (Goodman-Bacon 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goodman-Bacon 2021 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent studies recognize gig platforms as catalysts for entrepreneurial ventures.
“This perspective is supported by several recent studies that recognized gig platforms as catalysts for entrepreneurial ventures (e.g., Barrios et al. 2020, Vallas andSchor 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Barrios et al. 2020 source
- cites Vallas and Schor 2020 source
In “Incubators of Entrepreneurialism” (page unavailable), Vallas and Schor describe the view that platforms lower barriers and enable people to earn from their assets. They acknowledge some truth in that view but argue that platforms are unlikely to foster the envisioned crowd-based capitalism. The claim omits this substantial qualification. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWald test F-statistic equals 38.59 (p < 0.000) for the sum of coefficients.
“The F-statistic equals 38.59 (p < 0.000), suggesting the TaskRabbit effect on the supply of middle-skilled workers is negative and significant, supporting H2a (i).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTaskRabbit entry is positively and significantly associated with incumbent middle-skilled workers becoming self-employed incorporated (0.027, p<0.05), but not self-employed unincorporated (p>0.1).
“Table 6 shows that TaskRabbit entry is positively and statistically significantly associated with incumbent middle-skilled workers becoming self-employed incorporated (0.027, p < 0.05) instead of self-employed unincorporated (p > 0.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study's empirical findings indicate decreased demand for middle-skilled workers and unchanged demand for low-skilled workers in traditional housekeeping businesses.
“Our empirical findings indicate a decreased demand for middle-skilled workers, with the demand for low-skilled workers unchanged in traditional housekeeping businesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTaskRabbit entry does not significantly affect wages of managers, despite a decline in their employment.
“Interestingly, TaskRabbit entry does not significantly affect the wages of managers,foot_22 despite a decline in their employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study shows minimal impact of online gig platforms on the wages of incumbent housekeeping workers, although some subsamples show a negative wage effect on middle-skilled workers.
“Fourth, we show minimal impact of online gig platforms on the wages of incumbent housekeeping workers, though some subsamples show a negative wage effect on middle-skilled workers (Tables D4 and D18, Appendix D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant effects of TaskRabbit are observed on average annual wages of workers in skill-related occupations in other industries or self-employed workers in the housekeeping industry.
“Furthermore, we do not observe significant effects of TaskRabbit on the average annual wage of workers in skill-related occupations in other industries and self-employed workers in the housekeeping industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe mean number of workers in treated MSA units being treated is 15,379.
“We further calculate the mean number of workers in treated MSA units 32 being treated, which is 15,379.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHandy has similar size, service areas, and expansion history to TaskRabbit.
“According to our analyses of the competitors of TaskRabbit (Table D12), Handy is one platform that has similar size, service areas, and expansion history as TaskRabbit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGSC estimates show a negative and statistically significant TaskRabbit effect on the number of housekeeping managers (β = -0.146, p < 0.01) and no significant effect on low-skilled workers (p = 0.48 > 0.1), supporting H2a.
“The effect of TaskRabbit entry on the number of housekeeping managers is negative and statistically significant (𝛽 = -0.146,p < 0.01), while effect of TaskRabbit entry on the number of low-skilled workers is not significant (p = 0.48 > 0.1), supporting our hypotheses (H2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTaskRabbit entry does not significantly affect the number of workers in unemployment and skill-related occupations.
“While TaskRabbit entry does not significantly affect the number of workers in unemployment and skill-related occupations (Columns 1 and 2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe mean number of middle-skilled workers in treated units post-treatment is 2,133, and the potential average without treatment is 2,844.
“the mean number of middle-skilled workers from treated units in the post-treatment period, which is 2,133 and transfers to the potential average number had each of these units not been treated 2,844”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIncluding Thumbtack search intensity in the model yields consistent results.
“We included the search intensities for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe hourly wage coefficient for middle-skilled housekeeping workers is positive but not statistically significant.
“Although the coefficient for hourly wages is positive, it is not statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of TaskRabbit city entries occurred during summertime, with a few later in the year.
“We found the entry times for the majority of the cities are during the summertime, and a few of them were entered at the later time of the year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTaskRabbit entry is associated with higher counts of housekeeping establishments overall and in the 1-4, 5-9, 10-19, and 20-49 employee size categories, while estimated effects for larger size categories are not statistically significant.
“TaskRabbit | 0.056*** 0.079*** 0.043* 0.047** 0.039* | -0.014 | -0.024 | -0.093 | -0.076”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPre-treatment trends in middle-skilled employment are close between treated and untreated locations, and middle-skilled employment declines significantly after TaskRabbit entry.
“As seen, pre-treatment trends in middle-skilled employment of treated and untreated locations are remarkably close to each other, while middle-skilled employment declines significantly after the TaskRabbit Entry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningLow-skilled workers such as janitors and cleaners, whose jobs involve intensive manual tasks and interpersonal interactions, are less vulnerable to automation.
“In contrast, low-skilled workers (e.g., janitors, cleaners), whose roles entail intensive manual tasks and interpersonal interactions, are less vulnerable to automation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDixon et al. (2021) show that robots can replace managerial roles involving supervision and monitoring while creating new work opportunities for both high- and low-skilled workers, supporting polarized SBTC theory.
“Dixon et al. (2021) demonstrate that, while robots can replace managerial roles involving supervision and monitoring, they can simultaneously create new work opportunities for both high-and low-skilled workers, supporting the polarized version of SBTC theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al. 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms reduce search costs and improve matching efficiency by connecting workers with clients according to service requirements and preferences.
“Specifically, these platforms excel in connecting workers with clients based on service requirements and preferences, thus reducing search costs and enhancing matching efficiency (Schwellnus et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwellnus et al. 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe spread of workplace computers and technologies has automated routine-intensive jobs, leading to substitution of low-skilled workers.
“For example, the widespread adoption of workplace computers and technologies has led to the automation of routine-intensity jobs (e.g., cashiers, calculators), resulting in the substitution of low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFlexibility is the main reason workers are drawn to online gig platforms.
“Hall and Krueger (2018) suggest that flexibility is the primary reason that workers are attracted to online gig platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hall and Krueger 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior research finds that technology complements low-skilled workers doing manual tasks while replacing middle-skilled workers doing routine, easily automated cognitive tasks.
“Prior research has explored technology's role in complementing low-skilled workers performing manual tasks (e.g., truck driving) while substituting middle-skilled workers engaged in routine and readily automated cognitive tasks (e.g., record keeping) (Autor and Dorn 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor and Dorn 2013 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnline gig platforms may reduce the number of incumbent workers while stimulating local labor markets by moving those wage workers into self-employment.
“While online gig platforms may decrease the number of incumbent workers, they can stimulate local labor markets by redistributing these wage workers to self-employment, a novel avenue for encouraging new entrepreneurial endeavors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkill-Biased Technical Change theory holds that technology increases relative demand for high-skilled workers by raising their productivity while replacing low-skilled workers.
“Notably, Skill-Biased Technical Change (SBTC) theory suggests that technology raises the relative demand for high-skilled workers by boosting their productivity while substituting low-skilled workers (Card andDiNardo 2002, Acemoglu andAutor 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Card andDiNardo 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Acemoglu andAutor 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi et al. (2021) show that online gig platforms provide flexible work for low-skilled and unemployed workers, reducing overall unemployment.
“For example, Li et al. (2021) show that online gig platforms offer flexible work opportunities for low-skilled and unemployed workers, thereby reducing overall unemployment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnline gig platforms should not be viewed as simply skill-biased; their entry produces a labor redistribution effect that moves incumbent middle-skilled workers into self-employment.
“Integrating the main employment effects of online gig platforms with the observed labor movement, our study shows that online gig platforms may not naively be viewed as skill-biased; instead, their market entry exerts a labor redistribution effect that shifts incumbent middle-skilled workers to self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTaskRabbit is one of the earliest and largest online gig platforms that matches freelancers to local domestic housekeeping tasks.
“Second, TaskRabbit, founded in 2008, stands as one of the earliest and largest gig platforms enabling clients to outsource small offline domestic tasks (e.g., cleaning) to local independent workers (Isaac 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Isaac 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBurtch et al. (2018) find a negative relationship between Uber entry and local entrepreneurial activity, implying that online gig platforms provide viable work for unemployed or underemployed people.
“Connecting the proliferation of online gig platforms to job opportunities, Burtch et al. (2018) identify a negative relationship between Uber entry and local entrepreneurial activity, implying that online gig platforms offer viable work opportunities for the unemployed or underemployed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burtch et al. 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe observed labor movements support the Self-employment Effect but not the Unemployment Effect or the Relocation Effect.
“These results corroborate the Self-employment Effect, but not the other two labor movements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutor and Dorn (2013) show that growth in high-skilled and low-skilled jobs often comes at the expense of middle-skilled workers whose tasks are codifiable, easily automated, and vulnerable to technological displacement.
“Autor and Dorn (2013) elucidate the polarized distribution of employment among skilled occupations; they show that the growth of high-skilled and low-skilled jobs often occurs at the expense of middle-skilled workers whose tasks are codifiable, easily automated, and thus susceptible to technological displacement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor and Dorn 2013 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAfter TaskRabbit entry, middle-skilled workers could face unemployment if redundant, while low-skilled workers, whose roles do not overlap with platform functions, might see stable or increased demand.
“Post the entry of TaskRabbit, incumbent middle-skilled workers could face unemployment if deemed redundant, whereas low-skilled workers, whose roles do not overlap with the gig platform functionalities, might see stable or increased demand for their services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningWe included MSA-specific linear and quadratic time trends to capture time-varying unobserved heterogeneity that may correlate with housekeeping demand changes.
“We also included MSA-specific linear (𝜆 !𝑡) and quadratic time trends (𝛿 !𝑡 & ) to allow for a unique trajectory of potential socio-economic and regulatory patterns within each MSA over the sample period, further capturing the time-varying unobserved heterogeneity that may correlate with housekeeping demand changes within individual MSAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms may improve operational efficiency by making middle-skilled workers obsolete when their tasks, such as scheduling and supervising, can be replaced by technology.
“Online gig platforms might enhance operational efficiency by rendering incumbent middle-skilled workers obsolete when their tasks are replaceable by technology (Autor et al. 2003), such as scheduling and supervising services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor et al. 2003 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationIf online gig platforms can manage low-skilled workers more effectively, demand for middle-skilled workers would decline.
“As a result, the demand for middle-skilled workers would decline if online gig platforms could more effectively manage low-skilled workers (e.g., Violante 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Violante 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms provide work flexibility and autonomy, letting workers choose when and where they work.
“A key advantage of online gig platforms lies in their provision of work flexibility and autonomy (Vallas andSchor 2020, Anderson et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallas andSchor 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Anderson et al. 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenStandard errors were clustered at both MSA and year levels.
“We clustered standard errors at both the levels of MSA and year.22”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOnline gig platforms like TaskRabbit streamline matching of labor supply with local service demand, potentially displacing middle-skilled managers or supervisors in traditional housekeeping companies whose functions overlap with the platforms.
“Online gig platforms, such as TaskRabbit, streamline the process of matching labor supply with local service demand, potentially displacing middle-skilled managers or supervisors in traditional housekeeping companies that share major functional overlaps with these online gig platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe IPUMS dataset has been widely used in labor economics and IS literature.
“This dataset has widely been used in labor economics (e.g., Kerr and Lincoln 2010) and IS literature (e.g., Burtch et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kerr and Lincoln 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Burtch et al. 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningConsequently, displaced middle-skilled workers may opt for freelancer work to secure reliable income.
“Consequently, these workers may opt for freelancer work to secure a reliable income.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAfter ride-sharing was introduced in New York, demand for taxi drivers rose because clients could more easily find a taxi.
“Nandakumar (2020) notes that following the introduction of ride-sharing services in New York, the demand for taxi drivers increased as it became easier for clients to find a taxi.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nandakumar 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningMSAs were used as geographic units because TaskRabbit typically entered a broad region rather than a single city, and labor usually moves within such a region.
“We used MSAs as the geographic units for analysis because TaskRabbit typically entered a broad region (e.g., LA metro), instead of a single city, and labor usually moves within such a region (i.e., MSA) that consists of a city and surrounding communities linked by social and economic factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOnline gig platforms could counteract the surge by replacing a large portion of middle-skilled workers' jobs.
“Yet, online gig platforms could counteract this surge by replacing a large portion of middle-skilled workers' jobs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe CBP dataset provides annual subnational economic data by industry and MSA and has been widely used in IS research.
“The CBP dataset provides annual subnational economic data by industry and MSA, and it has widely been used in extant IS research (e.g., Kim and Hann 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim and Hann 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFollowing existing studies, we included covariates that potentially influence TaskRabbit entry and local housekeeping employment.
“Following existing studies on local employment and online gig platforms (e.g., Berger et al. 2018), we included several groups of covariates that potentially influence TaskRabbit entry and local housekeeping employment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berger et al. 2018 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTaskRabbit entry might shift middle-skilled workers, rather than low-skilled ones, to unemployment.
“Thus, it is possible that TaskRabbit's entry might shift middle-skilled workers, rather than low-skilled ones, to unemployment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningA surge in low-skilled workers may lead to gradually growing demand for middle-skilled workers to oversee and facilitate matching.
“With a substantial surge in low-skilled workers, a gradually growing demand for middle-skilled workers may follow to oversee and facilitate the matching of low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs gig platforms enhance operational efficiencies, demand for middle-skilled workers in traditional roles may wane, potentially displacing them.
“First, as gig platforms enhance operational efficiencies for companies, the demand for middle-skilled workers in traditional roles may wane, potentially displacing them from incumbent employment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOnline gig platforms may be more biased against, and may substitute for, middle-skilled workers than low-skilled workers.
“Hence, online gig platforms may exhibit a greater bias against, and even substitute, incumbent middle-skilled workers compared to low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTaskRabbit effect on supply of middle-skilled workers is negative and significant, supporting H2a(i).
“The F-statistic equals 38.59 (p < 0.000), suggesting the TaskRabbit effect on the supply of middle-skilled workers is negative and significant, supporting H2a (i).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrior research suggests workers are more likely to shift to related occupations with similar job skills, minimizing retraining needs.
“Prior research suggests that workers are more likely to shift to related occupations that share similar job skills, minimizing the need for extensive retraining (Robinson 2018, Cheng andPark 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Robinson 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cheng andPark 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationStudies indicate that automation can make middle-skilled managerial jobs obsolete because technology often performs these functions more cost-effectively.
“Studies indicate that automation can render such jobs obsolete (Ford 2015, Casey 2018) as technology often performs these functions more cost-effectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ford 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Casey 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDixon et al. (2021) suggest that robot adoption increases demand for low-skilled workers who perform residual tasks not yet automated.
“For instance, Dixon et al. (2021) suggest the adoption of robots leads to an increased demand for low-skilled workers capable of performing residual tasks that robots have not yet automated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al. (2021) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough rising industry demand can increase overall supply of housekeeping workers, middle-skilled workers are arguably less affected than low-skilled workers.
“Consequently, while rising industry demand can augment the overall supply of housekeeping workers, middle-skilled workers are arguably less affected than low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBarrios et al. (2020) illustrate that ride-sharing platforms have spurred increased business registrations and improved loan accessibility by providing a stable income source for self-employed drivers.
“For instance, Barrios et al. (2020) illustrate how ride-sharing platforms have spurred increased business registrations and improved loan accessibility by providing a stable income source for self-employed drivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barrios et al. (2020) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationWe employed a staggered Difference-in-Differences framework with two-way fixed effects, following several IS studies.
“We employed a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework with two-way fixed effects to estimate the impact of TaskRabbit entry on local incumbent housekeeping employment (H1), following several IS studies on the impact of online gig platforms (e.g., Burtch et al. 2018, Brynjolfsson et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results support the hypothesis that TaskRabbit entry negatively affects the number of incumbent housekeeping workers, but not the hypothesis about wages.
“The results support H1a (i) but not H1a (ii).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationcitationWith platforms like TaskRabbit, middle-skilled housekeeping workers may leave their roles and enter other skill-related non-housekeeping occupations requiring similar management and communication skills.
“In our context, with the emergence of platforms like TaskRabbit, middle-skilled housekeeping workers may leave their current roles and enter other skill-related (but non-housekeeping) occupations, such as those that require similar levels of management and communication skills (Tables C1 and C2 in Appendix C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOnline gig platforms may not simply show bias against certain low-skilled occupations; they may redistribute workers across employment modes.
“Against this backdrop, we argue that online gig platforms may not simply exhibit bias against certain (low-skilled) occupations, but they may redistribute workers across employment modes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEmployment growth for middle-skilled workers may be slower because their job functions overlap with online gig platforms.
“Second, the increase in middle-skilled worker employment might be slower due to their job functions overlapping with those of online gig platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior studies on online gig platforms' labor effects have presented competing theories and relied mostly on anecdotal evidence.
“Extant studies have debated the role of these platforms on local labor markets, often presenting competing theories and relying mostly on anecdotal evidence (Fraiberger and Sundararajan 2017, Schor 2017, Schwellnus et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fraiberger and Sundararajan 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schor 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schwellnus et al. 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe empirical exploration challenges a substitution explanation often posited by critics of online gig platforms and supports a labor redistribution explanation in which the rise of online gig platforms shifts middle-skilled workers in traditional businesses to self-employment.
“Our empirical exploration challenges a substitution explanation often posited by critics of online gig platforms, but rather it supports a labor redistribution explanation-the rise of online gig platforms shifts middle-skilled workers in traditional businesses to self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo address the non-randomness of TaskRabbit entry, the main analysis included a comprehensive set of covariates to account for potential confounders.
“To address the non-randomness of TaskRabbit's entry, we included a comprehensive set of covariates in our main analysis to account for potential confounders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe analysis is limited to two major gig platforms, TaskRabbit and Handy.
“We acknowledge the existence of other gig platforms in similar markets, but our analysis is limited to two major ones (TaskRabbit and Handy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnline gig platforms not only streamline business operations by matching and supervising, but also give middle-skilled workers in traditional companies opportunities to start their own ventures and participate in the gig economy.
“For practitioners, our findings imply that online gig platforms not only streamline business operations by matching and supervising, but also provide middle-skilled workers in traditional companies with opportunities to start their own ventures and participate in the gig economy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study uses only one online gig platform, TaskRabbit, as its empirical focus.
“Second, we acknowledge that we use only one online gig platform, TaskRabbit, as our empirical focus to illustrate the employment effects of gig platforms on incumbent housekeeping workers, although other platforms exist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExtant studies suggest self-employed incorporated workers are more likely entrepreneurs starting businesses, while self-employed unincorporated workers are more like freelancers or independent contractors.
“Extant studies suggest that self-employed incorporated workers are more likely to be entrepreneurs who start their own businesses, while self-employed unincorporated workers are more like freelancers or independent contractors who work on their own (Rubinstein and Levine 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubinstein and Levine 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study explores only one subgroup of service occupations: housekeeping occupations.
“Third, while online gig platforms can affect a broader range of service occupations, our study only explores one subgroup of them-housekeeping occupations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFurther in-depth analysis reveals that online gig platforms do not completely replace jobs of incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers but instead redistribute these workers to self-employment, stimulating local entrepreneurial endeavors.
“Our further in-depth analysis reveals that online gig platforms do not completely replace jobs of incumbent middle-skilled housekeeping workers, but rather they redistribute these workers to self-employment, stimulating local entrepreneurial endeavors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnline gig platforms do not necessarily replace middle-skilled workers but instead create opportunities for them, driving them toward local self-employment activities.
“Upon further exploration, our findings reveal that online gig platforms do not necessarily replace middleskilled workers but instead create job opportunities for them, driving them toward local self-employment activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPast housekeeping employment and wage trends did not predict TaskRabbit entry, which suggests reverse causality is not a major concern.
“The results show that past employment and wage trends do not predict TaskRabbit entry (see Table D2, Appendix D), suggesting that reverse causality may not be a serious concern in our study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDue to data limitations, the study cannot track how many self-employed workers use TaskRabbit for their businesses.
“Due to data limitations, we cannot track how many self-employed workers use TaskRabbit for their businesses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataAcross 1,000 random placebo assignments, the mean placebo treatment effect was not different from zero and not significantly different from the DiD estimates, indicating the observed TaskRabbit effects are not spurious.
“found the mean of placebo treatment effects does not deviate from zero, let alone significantly different from our DiD estimates in Table 4, indicating that the observed effects of TaskRabbit entry were not spurious.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline gig platforms have substantially reshaped U.S. labor markets by lowering search costs and giving workers flexibility and autonomy.
“Online gig platforms have substantially reshaped the U.S. labor markets by reducing search costs (Chen andHorton 2016, Goldfarb andTucker 2019) and granting workers flexibility and autonomy (e.g., Burtch et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chen andHorton 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Goldfarb andTucker 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Burtch et al. 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis corroborates its role in improving operational efficiency and reducing reliance on these workers.
“Additional analysis shows that TaskRabbit's entry significantly reduces working hours for middle-skilled workers (Table E2, Appendix E), further corroborating its role in improving operational efficiency and reducing reliance on these workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe observed effects may apply to other service occupations, such as moving services, that share similar tasks with housekeeping occupations.
“We argue that the observed effects may apply to other service occupations (e.g., moving services) that share similar tasks with housekeeping occupations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study could not account for every platform because of data constraints.
“Nevertheless, we could not account for every platform due to data constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLow-skilled workers may not transition because online gig platforms cannot directly replace them and they have little incentive to become self-employed.
“Our additional findings suggest that low-skilled workers may not transition because online gig platforms cannot directly replace low-skilled workers, and these workers have little incentive to move to self-employment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTechnology substitutes routine tasks but complements complex manual tasks that are not easily automated.
“This aligns with recent developments in STBC theory, particularly the polarized employment in service occupations (Autor and Dorn 2013), which suggests that technology substitutes routine tasks but complements complex manual tasks that are not easily automated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor and Dorn 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe findings are specific to new businesses in the housekeeping industry and may not apply to other industries.
“Finally, our findings are specific to new businesses in the housekeeping industry and may not apply to other industries (e.g., new technology).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataInitial evidence suggests gig platforms are skill-biased by substituting incumbent middle-skilled workers whose routine tasks heavily overlap with services offered by gig platforms, while having little impact on low-skilled workers who perform manual, labor-intensive tasks.
“Our initial evidence suggests that gig platforms are “skill-biased,” by substituting incumbent middle-skilled workers whose routine tasks heavily overlap with the services offered by gig platforms, while having little impact on low-skilled workers who perform manual, labor-intensive tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnline gig platforms may facilitate the redistribution of middle-skilled labor toward self-employment, thereby fostering local entrepreneurial activities.
“Instead, they may facilitate the redistribution of the middle-skilled labor force toward self-employment, thereby fostering local entrepreneurial activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSubsample robustness checks using coarsened exact matching, treated-only MSAs, top 50 MSAs, and excluding post-2017 samples all produced results consistent with the baseline DiD estimates.
“In each of the above cases, results remained consistent with our baseline DiD estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAggregate-level results are highly consistent with individual-worker data and further corroborate the self-employment effect (H3c).
“The results from the aggregate level analysis are highly consistent with those using the individual worker data, further corroborating the hypothesized self-employment effect (H3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCounty Business Patterns data have been widely used in prior studies to examine or control local establishment counts by industry.
“County Business Patterns have been widely used in prior studies to examine or control the number of local establishments by industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSkill percentile is measured by the U.S. mean occupational wage in 1980, following Autor and Dorn (2013).
“PerAutor and Dorn (2013), the skill percentile is measured by the U.S. mean occupational wage in 1980.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor and Dorn (2013) source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataThe negative wage effect in the building and dwelling industry subsample supports the idea that demand for incumbent middle-skilled workers declined.
“These results bolster the notion of a diminished demand for incumbent middle-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the subsample of only treated MSAs, the significant negative effects of TaskRabbit remain, supporting the baseline DiD estimate.
“The significant negative effects of TaskRabbit remain, further supporting the baseline DiD estimate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHandy entry has similar negative effects on middle-skilled workers, corroborating the generalizability of the main TaskRabbit findings.
“We found similar negative effects of the entry of Handy on middle-skilled workers, corroborating the generalizability of our main findings from TaskRabbit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRoutine-intensive occupations tend to fall in the middle of the skill distribution, while manual-intensive occupations tend to be at the bottom.
“Routine-intensive occupations (e.g., first-line managers) tend to fall in the middle of the distribution (thereby being classified as the 'middleskilled'), while manual-intensive occupations (e.g., cleaners) tend to be at the bottom of the distribution (thereby 'low-skilled').”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Autor and Dorn (2013) source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe synthetic control model constructs a weighted combination of untreated MSAs that resembles treated MSAs in pre-treatment covariates and outcomes, satisfying the parallel trend assumption.
“The synthetic control model constructs a weighted combination of untreated MSAs (i.e., synthetic controls) that closely resembles the covariates and outcome of the treated MSAs in the pre-treatment periods, which naturally satisfies the parallel trend assumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Abadie andGardeazabal 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Abadie et al. 2010 source
- cites Bai 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBacon decomposition shows negative TaskRabbit effects on housekeeping worker numbers for all three groups, suggesting the main negative effects are not driven by the timing-varying group.
“As seen, the effects of TaskRabbit on the number of housekeeping workers are negative for all three groups, suggesting that main negative effects we observed are not driven by the timing-varying group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe pre-treatment trend results support the validity of the baseline DiD estimates.
“These results support the validity of the baseline DiD estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAdjusting the treatment variable for TaskRabbit entry months in October, November, or December by recoding treatment to 1 for the next calendar year yields consistent results.
“We also adjusted the measurement for the treatment variable based on the specific TaskRabbit entry month of a year (i.e., if the entry month is October, November, or December, we recoded the treatment equal to 1 for the next calendar year).The results are consistent and are available in online Appendix D.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPast employment numbers and average wages do not statistically significantly predict TaskRabbit entry, which precludes the reverse causality concern.
“As seen, the number and average wage of workers in the past years do not statistically significantly predict TaskRabbit entry, precluding the concern of reverse causality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe permutation test's pseudo effects are centered around zero, and the t-test fails to reject the null that the average random-treatment effect differs from zero.
“Figure D1 shows the distribution of the pseudo effects, which are centered around zero, and the t-test fails to reject the null hypothesis that the average estimated effect based on random treatments is statistically different from zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe heterogeneity-robust DiD model still shows significant effects for middle-skilled workers and no effect for low-skilled workers.
“As seen in Table D10, we still observe significant effects for middle-skilled workers while no effect for low-skilled workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThumbtack's role in matching is less direct than TaskRabbit's, which may limit the strength of its impact.
“These could suggest a less direct role in matching compared to TaskRabbit, which may limit the strength of its impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA Pew Research survey indicates that about 70% of gig platform workers keep their current jobs and use online gig platforms as side jobs.
“For instance, a Pew Research survey indicates that around 70% of gig platform workers maintain their current jobs and use online gig platforms as side jobs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pew Research survey
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTaskRabbit use improves operational efficiency in housekeeping firms, reducing the need for middle-skilled workers to spend hours on tasks that the platform also handles.
“These results support the notion that the use of TaskRabbit enhances operational efficiency in housekeeping companies, consequently reducing the need for middle-skilled workers spending their working hours on functions (e.g., matching and supervising) overlapped with those facilitated by the online gig platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe company-size results complement the proposed mechanism.
“which further complement our proposed mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCEM has been widely used to address selection bias in IS studies.
“CEM has widely been used to address selection bias in IS studies (e.g., Bapna et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bapna et al. 2016 source
The authors state this as an assumption.
Absent TaskRabbit entry, pre-treatment employment trends would have been parallel between TaskRabbit-entry locations and non-entry locations.
“to better satisfy the parallel trend assumption of the pre-treatment employment (Xu 2017).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this study, there was insufficient theoretical understanding and rigorous empirical analysis of how online gig platforms affect local employment.
“While both predictions have been reflected in recent anecdotes, 2 there has been a lack of theoretical understanding and rigorous empirical analysis on the effects of online gig platforms on local employment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit's staggered expansion into U.S. cities is not driven by local housekeeping employment trends.
“We exploited the quasi-experimental setting where TaskRabbit expanded across U.S. cities at different times, employing the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach with location and time fixed effects to estimate its effect on the employment of incumbent workers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online gig platforms cannot readily substitute for low-skilled workers performing in-person manual housekeeping tasks.
“In contrast, online gig platforms cannot readily substitute low-skilled workers for in-person manual housekeeping tasks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Entry of online gig platforms can directly increase demand for low-skilled workers because they can readily perform such tasks.
“First, the entry of online gig platforms can directly elevate the demand for lowskilled workers, as they can readily perform such tasks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online gig platforms offer financial security by allowing workers to sustain income as independent freelancers if entrepreneurial ventures falter, reducing financial risk.
“Besides, online gig platforms offer a form of financial security, allowing workers to sustain income as independent freelancers if their entrepreneurial ventures falter, thus reducing financial risk.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of analysis and evidence on labor movement amid the rise of the online gig economy.
“However, there remains a dearth of analysis and evidence to elucidate the labor movement amid the rise of the online gig economy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SBTC is a dominant hypothesis in labor economics that technology is positively biased toward highly skilled workers by increasing their relative productivity while substituting low-skilled workers.
“SBTC has been a dominant hypothesis in labor economics, implying that technology is positively biased towards highly skilled workers by increasing their relative productivity while substituting low-skilled workers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous SBTC research mainly focused on general-purpose technologies such as computers in the workplace.
“Although previous SBTC research has mainly focused on general-purpose technologies, such as computers in the workplace, our study broadens the scope to include online gig platforms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit is one of the largest and earliest platforms of housekeeping services.
“While our empirical focus is on TaskRabbit, one of the largest and earliest platforms of housekeeping services, it is crucial to acknowledge the presence of similar gig platforms in the market, such as Handy and Thumbtack, which may potentially influence our observed effect of TaskRabbit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Handy shares comparable staggered expansion history and size with TaskRabbit.
“Second, we focused on one major competitor-Handy-which shares comparable staggered expansion history and size with TaskRabbit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit tends to enter big cities because of their accumulation of housekeeping demand.
“Third, to account for TaskRabbit's tendency to enter big cities, given their accumulation of housekeeping demand, we replicated the analysis by only including the top 50 MSAs with large populations (Table D7, Appendix D).”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit was acquired by IKEA in 2017.
“Finally, to alleviate the impact brought by the acquisition from IKEA in 2017, we excluded all samples after 2017 and replicated the analysis (Table D8, Appendix D).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online gig platforms typically offer significant autonomy and control over aspects such as setting service prices and defining and supervisory work tasks.
“Online gig platforms typically offer significant autonomy and control over aspects such as setting service prices and defining and supervisory work tasks.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The difference-in-differences estimates are valid only if treated and untreated MSAs would have followed parallel trends absent TaskRabbit entry.
“While we used the DiD framework to establish our primary evidence for the effects of TaskRabbit entry, the parallel trend assumption is not directly testable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit was acquired by IKEA in 2017 and subsequently offered additional services that could confound the main results.
“Finally, in 2017, TaskRabbit was acquired by IKEA, and it then offered additional services, such as furniture assembly and delivery services, which may confound our main results.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effect of TaskRabbit entry may take more than one year to fully materialize.
“It is likely that the effect of TaskRabbit entry might have taken more than one year to fully materialize.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The treatment effect of TaskRabbit is constant over time.
“Therefore, we assume a constant treatment effect over time to calculate the impact on the number of workers post-TaskRabbit's entry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TaskRabbit's non-cleaning tasks may reduce the accuracy of using TaskRabbit entry as a treatment for housekeeping services.
“It is known that TaskRabbit also offers non-cleaning tasks (e.g., moving), which may influence the measurement accuracy of our treatment variable-TaskRabbit entry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Thumbtack's broader service range means housekeeping services are only a small fraction of its operations.
“Furthermore, it is important to note that Thumbtack offers a wider range of services than TaskRabbit, including sectors like wedding photography and tax consultation, which means the impact of housekeeping services is only a small fraction of its overall operations and tasks available.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The DiD estimates rely on no difference in pre-treatment employment trends between treated and untreated MSAs (parallel trends).
“The critical assumption of the DiD estimates lies in no difference in the pre-treatment employment trends between treated and untreated MSAs (i.e., parallel trend assumption).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The calculation of the number assumes a constant treatment effect.
“This number is calculate based on the assumption of a constant treatment effect.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Housekeeping tasks constitute the main services offered by many emerging gig platforms.
“We use the housekeeping occupation as our empirical instantiation because the tasks involved in housekeeping constitute the main services offered by many emerging gig platforms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MSAs not yet chosen by TaskRabbit might not be an ideal counterfactual to treated MSAs.
“We address a potential selection issue; that is, MSAs having yet to be chosen by TaskRabbit might not be an ideal counterfactual to the treated MSAs.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Linear-probability effect is interpreted using a log-model transformation
MajorTable 5 reports a linear probability model coefficient of 0.069 for the transition to self-employment. That is a 6.9-percentage-point increase in probability, not the stated 7.1% obtained by exponentiating a coefficient.
Reported 7.1 · recomputed 6.9
“In Column 3, we observe a statistically significant increase in the probability of middle-skilled workers moving from work-for-wages employment status in traditional companies to self-employment in the same housekeeping occupations (i.e., 7.1% = 100 × (𝑒 +.+0/ -1)%, p < 0.05)”
GSC observation count exceeds possible MSA-year cells
MajorThe GSC data are said to be collapsed to MSA-year level for 267 MSAs over 14 years, which permits at most 3,738 observations per skill-level analysis. Table D11 instead reports 12,142 for low-skilled workers; its 5,018 middle-skilled observations also exceed that maximum.
Reported 12142 · recomputed 3738
“Table D11.Generalized Synthetic Control: TaskRabbit Effects on Local Housekeeping Workers Dependent Variables: ln (Number of Workers) ln (Average Annual Wage) Middle-skilled Low-skilled Middle-skilled Low-skilled (1) (2) (3) (4) TaskRabbit -0.146*** 0.011 0.050 -0.032 (0.035) (0.016) (0.092) (0.042) Time-varying Covariates Yes Yes Yes Yes Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes MSA FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Occupation FE Yes Yes Yes Yes # Observations 5,018 12,142 5,018 12,142”
Reported panel exceeds its stated number of cells
MajorThe stated panel has 267 MSAs, six occupations, and 14 years, allowing at most 22,428 MSA-occupation-year observations, not 24,360.
Reported 24360 · recomputed 22428
“We merged and aggregated these data into an MSA-occupation-year level panel dataset containing 24,360 observations covering 267 MSAsfoot_10 and six housekeeping occupationsfoot_11 that were consistently identified in the 14-year panel period from 2005-2018.”
Matched-sample observation counts differ between tables
MinorThe matched-MSA analysis has 2,047 observations in Table D4 but 2,074 in the corresponding row of the specification summary.
“# Observations 2,047 2,047 2,047 2,047”
“2. Matching (CEM) -0.062 (0.022) -0.322** (0.141) 2,074”
Matched-sample observation totals disagree
MinorThe matched-MSA analysis is reported with 2,047 observations in Table D4 but 2,074 in the specification summary.
“Table D4.DiD Estimates Adjusted Using Coarsened Exact Matched MSAs”
“2. Matching (CEM) -0.062 (0.022) -0.322** (0.141) 2,074”
Stated effect range excludes a listed estimate
MinorThe stated range for the total-worker effect contains only negative estimates, but Table D23 includes a positive estimate of 0.020 for the building-and-dwelling-industry specification.
“As observed on Table D23, the estimates of the impact of TaskRabbit on the total number of workers range from -0.041 to -0.095.”
“11.Only workers in building and dwelling industry 0.020 (0.051) -0.207*** (0.046) 9,370”
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641 · see citing works
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001 · Cited by 9,126 · see citing works
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727 · see citing works
Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014 · Cited by 8,046 · see citing works
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205 · see citing works
Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746 · Cited by 5,513 · see citing works
The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country
Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455188 · Cited by 4,517 · see citing works
The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market
Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.1553 · Cited by 3,824 · see citing works
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799 · see citing works
Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching
Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr013 · Cited by 3,563 · see citing works
Harrison, A. J., Robinson, C., Ashenfelter, O., & Layard, R. (1989) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.2307/135687 · Cited by 3,321 · see citing works
How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-in-Differences Estimates?
Baker, A. C., Larcker, D. F., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2022) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004 · Cited by 3,149 · see citing works
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744 · see citing works
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,633 · see citing works
Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3 · Cited by 2,612 · see citing works
The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0204 · Cited by 2,376 · see citing works
Capital-skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis
(2000) · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00150 · Cited by 2,106 · see citing works
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767 · see citing works
Skill‐Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles
Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/342055 · Cited by 1,714 · see citing works
Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6135 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
Cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata
Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900402 · Cited by 1,689 · see citing works
Autor, D. H. (2003) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/344122 · Cited by 1,534 · see citing works
Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects
Abadie, A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20191450 · Cited by 1,486 · see citing works
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
Toward a Dynamic Learning Perspective of Entrepreneurship
Cope, J. (2005) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2015) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship
Lazear, E. P. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041301425 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models
Xu, Y. (2017) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2016.2 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber
Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.p20161002 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24001 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
The Supply Side of Innovation: H‐1B Visa Reforms and U.S. Ethnic Invention
Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. F. (2010) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/651934 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States
Hall, J. V., & Krueger, A. B. (2018) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/0019793917717222 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.31 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates?Preprint
Baker, A., Larcker, D. F., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3794018 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
The Growth of Low Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor MarketPreprint
Autor, D., & Dorn, D. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2192764 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.192294 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15333 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Einav, L., Farronato, C., & Levin, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Dependence and precarity in the platform economy
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y · Cited by 550 · see citing works
The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms
Dixon, J., Hong, B., & Wu, L. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3812 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24917 · Cited by 408
Schor, J. B. (2016) · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsw047 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect
Berger, T., Chen, C., & Frey, C. B. (2018) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.006 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘Gig Economy’
Berger, T., Frey, C. B., Levin, G., & Danda, S. R. (2019) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/epolic/eiz007 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Risk, Entrepreneurship and Human Capital Accumulation
Iyigun, M. F., & Owen, A. L. (1998) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.53661 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
(2008) · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2388-1 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
The Effects of Algorithmic Labor Market Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Horton, J. J. (2017) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/689213 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship
Fossen, F. M., & Sorgner, A. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.019 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Supply Side of Innovation: H-1B Visa Reforms and US Ethnic Invention
Kerr, W. A., & Lincoln, W. F. (2010) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15768 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Internet’s Dirty Secret: Assessing the Impact of Online Intermediaries on HIV Transmission1
Chan, J., & Ghose, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.01 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Mitigating Traffic Congestion: The Role of Intelligent Transportation Systems
Cheng, Z. (., Pang, M., & Pavlou, P. A. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0894 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationPRACTITIONERS CORNER: An Advantage of the Linear Probability Model over Probit or Logit
Caudill, S. B. (1988) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1988.mp50004005.x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Greenwood, B. N., & Agarwal, R. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2232 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber
Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22083 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?
(2019) · OECD Economics Department Working Papers · doi:10.1787/fdb0570b-en · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Can Reputation Discipline the Gig Economy? Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market
Benson, A. M., Sojourner, A., & Umyarov, A. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3303 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services
Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2017) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0709 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, D. L., & Horton, J. J. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0633 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates LaborPreprint
Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3390283 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Paywalls: Monetizing Online Content
Pattabhiramaiah, A., Sriram, S., & Manchanda, P. (2018) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242918815163 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The COVID-19 Pandemic Disrupted Both School Bullying and Cyberbullying
Bacher-Hicks, A., Goodman, J., Green, J. G., & Holt, M. K. (2022) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20210456 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Kozlinska, I., Rebmann, A., & Mets, T. (2020) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1821159 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
High-Touch and Here-to-Stay: Future Skills Demands in US Low Wage Service Occupations
Gatta, M., Boushey, H., & Appelbaum, E. (2009) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038509340735 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Do fit opinions matter? The impact of fit context on online product returns
Wang, Y., Ramachandran, V., & Liu Sheng, O. R. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0965 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Digital Sin City: An Empirical Study of Craigslist’s Impact on Prostitution Trends
Chan, J., Mojumder, P., & Ghose, A. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0799 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Li, Z., Hong, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870387 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Let the Sunshine In”: The Impact of Industry Payment Disclosure on Physician Prescription Behavior
Guo, T., Sriram, S., & Manchanda, P. (2020) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1181 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flows and Boundaries: A Network Approach to Studying Occupational Mobility in the Labor Market
Cheng, S., & Park, B. (2020) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/712406 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Occupational Mobility and the Business Cycle
(2008) · doi:10.3386/w13819 · Cited by 55
Cross-Platform Spillover Effects in Consumption of Rich Digital Media
Krijestorac, H., Garg, R., Mahajan, V., & Hofstede, F. T. (2017) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0897 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Context may be King, but generalizability is the Emperor!
Cheng, Z., Dimoka, A., & Pavlou, P. A. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0005-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citation(2016) · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0645 · Cited by 36
Entrepreneurship and the gig economy: A bibliometric analysis
Silva, B. C., & Moreira, A. C. (2022) · Cuadernos de Gestión · doi:10.5295/cdg.211580am · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Dahlstrom, T. R., & Talmage, C. A. (2018) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330.2018.1491613 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction
Agrawal, A. K., Gans, J. S., & Avi Goldfarb, B. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25619 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Occupational Mobility, Occupation Distance and Specific Human Capital
Robinson, C. (2017) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.53.2.0814.6556r2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Launching with a Parachute: The Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Entry
Barrios, J. M., Hochberg, Y. V., & Yi, H. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3557279 · Cited by 19
Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models
Xu, Y. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2584200 · Cited by 11
The Digital Sin City: An Empirical Study of Craigslist's Impact on Prostitution TrendsPreprint
Chan, J., Mojumder, P., & Ghose, A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3057722 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Effects of Algorithmic Labor Market Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Horton, J. J. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2346486 · Cited by 2
(2017) · doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0760 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Structural Two-Sided Matching Model of Online Labor Markets
Gong, J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2745450
Einav, L., Farronato, C., & Levin, J. (2015) · doi:10.3386/w21496
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Blinder AS (2009) How many US jobs might be offshorable? World Econ. 10(2):41.
- Brynjolfsson E, 2018, The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, 23
- Jenkins ME, 2023, Tech-Enabled Gig Jobs: Policy Solutions for the Future of Work
- Silva BC, 2022, Management Lett., 22, 23
- Sundararajan A, 2017, The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism
- Violante GL, 2008, New Palgrave Dictionary Econom., 2, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Navigating Exclusivity and Free Offerings: How Digital Paywalls Influence Content Creators' BehaviorPreprint
Ye, X., Guo, D., Gao, C., Huang, N., & Hong, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5237649
Supplier Responses to Platform Recommendations in Business-to-Business Electronic CommercePreprint
Chen, Y., Cong, Z., Chen, Y., & Hou, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6762138
- Authors
- Guo, X., Cheng, Z. (., & Pavlou, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pavlou, Paul A.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1354-1374
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W4404322900
- Semantic Scholar
- 0f4680b40fa291730332864557e0e5850d69bf20
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- skill-biased technological change, TaskRabbit, service employees, automation, self-employment, local employment, gig economy, labor market displacement, job design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review