The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect
Open accessAbstract
Nanocellulose, a unique and promising natural material extracted from native cellulose, has gained much attention for its use as biomedical material, because of its remarkable physical properties, special surface chemistry and excellent biological properties (biocompatibility, biodegradability and low toxicity). Three different types of nanocellulose, viz. cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and bacterial cellulose (BC), are introduced and compared in terms of production, properties and biomedical applications in this article. The advancement of nanocellulose-based biomedical materials is summarized and discussed on the analysis of latest studies (especially reports from the past five years). Selected studies with significant findings are emphasized, and focused topics for nanocellulose in biomedicine research in this article include the discussion at the level of molecule (e.g. tissue bioscaffolds for cellular culture; drug excipient and drug delivery; and immobilization and recognition of enzyme/protein) as well as at the level of macroscopic biomaterials (e.g. blood vessel and soft tissue substitutes; skin and bone tissue repair materials; and antimicrobial materials). Functional modification of nanocellulose will determine the potential biomedical application for nanocellulose, which is also introduced as a separated section in the article. Finally, future perspectives and possible research points are proposed in Section 5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Villanova, J. C. O., Ayres, E., Carvalho, S. M., Patrício, P. S., Pereira, F. V., & Oréfice, R. L. (2011) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2011.01.005 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review
Picheth, G. F., Pirich, C. L., Sierakowski, M. R., Woehl, M. A., Sakakibara, C. N., de Souza, C. F., Martin, A. A., da Silva, R., & de Freitas, R. A. (2017) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171 · Cited by 624
Liu, C., Li, B., Du, H., Lv, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, G., Mu, X., & Peng, H. (2016) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.025 · Cited by 382
Recent trends and applications of cellulose nanocrystals in food industry
Mu, R., Hong, X., Ni, Y., Li, Y., Pang, J., Wang, Q., Xiao, J., & Zheng, Y. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.013 · Cited by 322
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Kim, S. (2018) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2018/1708172 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, N., & Dufresne, A.
- Venue
- European Polymer Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 302-325
- ISSN
- 0014-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067381870
- Cited by
- 1,658
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025
- The paper
- Lin, N., & Dufresne, A. (2014). Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. European Polymer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.