The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods
Abstract
In this work, nanocellulose was extracted from bleached corncob residue (CCR), an underutilized lignocellulose waste from furfural industry, using four different methods (i.e. sulfuric acid hydrolysis, formic acid (FA) hydrolysis, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation, and pulp refining, respectively). The self-assembled structure, morphology, dimension, crystallinity, chemical structure and thermal stability of prepared nanocellulose were investigated. FA hydrolysis produced longer cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) than the one obtained by sulfuric acid hydrolysis, and resulted in high crystallinity and thermal stability due to its preferential degradation of amorphous cellulose and lignin. The cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) with fine and individualized structure could be isolated by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. In comparison with other nanocellulose products, the intensive pulp refining led to the CNFs with the longest length and the thickest diameter. This comparative study can help to provide an insight into the utilization of CCR as a potential source for nanocellulose production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959) · Textile Research Journal · doi:10.1177/004051755902901003 · Cited by 8,613
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass
Sluiter, A. D., Hames, B. R., Ruiz, R. O., Scarlata, C. J., Sluiter, J. B., Templeton, D. W., & Crocker, D. P. (2012) · Cited by 5,261
Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect
Lin, N., & Dufresne, A. (2014) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025 · Cited by 1,658
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses
Habibi, Y. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60204d · Cited by 1,561
Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Davoudpour, Y., Islam, M. N., Mustapha, A., Sudesh, K., Dungani, R., & Jawaid, M. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069 · Cited by 1,333
Roman, M., & Winter, W. T. (2004) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm034519+ · Cited by 1,272
Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications
Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 · Cited by 1,121
Xu, X., Liu, F., Jiang, L., Zhu, J. Y., Haagenson, D., & Wiesenborn, D. P. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am302624t · Cited by 1,002
Cited by
Hoo, D. Y., Low, Z. L., Low, D. Y. S., Tang, S. Y., Manickam, S., Tan, K. W., & Ban, Z. H. (2022) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106176 · Cited by 309
Production of Nanocellulose and Its Applications in Drug Delivery: A Critical Review
Salimi, S., Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R., Zarghami, R., Chan, S. Y., & Yuen, K. H. (2019) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02744 · Cited by 268
Preparation and research of PCL/cellulose composites: Cellulose derived from agricultural wastes
Chen, J., Huang, Y., Deng, L., Jiang, H., Yang, Z., Yang, R., & Wu, D. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123785 · Cited by 45
Effects of acid hydrolysis on the extraction of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs): A review
Department of Chemistry, U. O. Z., MOHOMANE, S. M., MOTLOUNG, S. V., Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, P. B. X., KOAO, L. F., Department of Physics, U. O. T. F. S. (. C., MOTAUNG, T. E., & Department of Chemistry, S. M. H. S. U. (2022) · Cellulose Chemistry and Technology · doi:10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2022.56.61 · Cited by 39
Khoo, R. Z., Chow, W. S., & Ismail, H. (2023) · Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials · doi:10.1177/08927057221098972 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C., Li, B., Du, H., Lv, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, G., Mu, X., & Peng, H.
- Venue
- Carbohydrate Polymers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 716-724
- ISSN
- 0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2417008959
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.025
- The paper
- Liu, C., Li, B., Du, H., Lv, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, G., Mu, X., & Peng, H. (2016). Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods. Carbohydrate Polymers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
