Cited by 28Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The Evolution of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy—The Third Generation and Its Effectiveness

Open access
Carvalho, S., Martins, C.P., Almeida, H.S., Silva, F.·2017·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction. First wave cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) focuses essentially on classical conditioning and operant learning and second wave on information processing. They are based on the premise that certain cognitions, emotions and physiological states lead to dysfunctional behaviour and so, by eliminating the first ones, changes in behaviour will take place. Third wave CBT appeared in an attempt to increase the effectiveness of first and second wave by emphasizing contextual and experiential change strategies. Objectives/Aims. To make a review on the actual state of the art of third wave CBT, focusing on MBSR (Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction), MCBT (Mindfulness-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy), DBT (Dialectical Behaviour Therapy), ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and CFT (Compassion Focused Therapy). Methods. Research on PubMed using the terms “third wave cognitive behavioural therapy”. Results. Methods and targets differ between MBSR, MCBT, DBT, ACT and CFT. Depression, anxiety and borderline personality disorders are some of those targets. However, a transdiagnostic approach is the hallmark of all third wave therapies: mental processes or emotions transversal to many psychiatric disorders such as shame, self-criticism, experiential avoidance or cognitive fusion are the main focus, emphasizing the context and human experience over any categorical diagnosis. Conclusions. Third wave cognitive behavioural therapy is an emerging approach born from the need to improve and complement first and second waves. Although very promising, it is still a recent approach and data to support its superiority over the conventional therapies is missing. Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1461

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, S., Martins, C. P., Almeida, H. S., & Silva, F.
Affiliations
Hospital de Magalhães Lemos (PT)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2017-04
Volume
41
Issue
S1
Pages
s773-s774
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2724994835
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, transdiagnostic approach, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, shame, self-criticism, depression, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review