Cited by 82Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Cognitive and/or Behavioral Therapies (CBT) for Tinnitus

Landry, Evie C., Sandoval, Xochitl Citlalli Romo, Simeone, Calla N., Tidball, Glynnis, Lea, Jane, Westerberg, Brian D.·2020·Otology & Neurotology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of cognitive and/or behavioral therapies in improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL), depression, and anxiety associated with tinnitus. Data sources EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Registry were used to identify English studies from database inception until February 2018. Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cognitive and/or behavioral therapies to one another or to waitlist controls for the treatment of tinnitus were included. Data extraction Quality and risk were assessed using GRADE and Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool respectively. Data synthesis Pairwise meta-analysis (12 RCTs: 1,144 patients) compared psychological interventions to waitlist controls. Outcomes were measured using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). I and subgroup analyses were used to assess heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis (NMA) (19 RCTS: 1,543 patients) compared psychological therapies head-to-head. Treatment effects were presented by network diagrams, interval plots, and ranking diagrams indicating SMDs with 95% CI. Direct and indirect results were further assessed by inconsistency plots. Conclusions Results are consistent with previously published guidelines indicating that CBT is an effective therapy for tinnitus. While guided self-administered forms of CBT had larger effect sizes (SMD: 3.44; 95% CI: -0.022, 7.09; I: 99%) on tinnitus HRQOL, only face-to-face CBT was shown to ma…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mao.0000000000002472

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tunkel, 2014, Clinical practice guideline, Otolaryngol Neck Surg, 151, S1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 82

Metadata

Authors
Landry, E. C., Sandoval, X. C. R., Simeone, C. N., Tidball, G., Lea, J., & Westerberg, B. D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Landry, Evie C.
  • Tidball, Glynnis
  • Lea, Jane
  • Westerberg, Brian D.
Venue
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2020-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
153-166
ISSN
  • 1531-7129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4505
OpenAlex
W2983502078
Cited by
82
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otology & Neurotology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological intervention, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, treatment efficacy comparison
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Cognition, Humans, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review