CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 568Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Frajerman, Ariel, Morvan, Yannick, Krebs, Marie-Odile, Gorwood, Philip, Chaumette, Boris·2019·European Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Applying the concept of burnout to medical students before residency is relatively recent. Its estimated prevalence varies significantly between studies. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of burnout in medical students worldwide. Methods: We systematically searched Medline for English-language articles published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017. We selected all the original studies about the prevalence of burnout in medical students before residency, using validated questionnaires for burnout. Statistical analyses were conducted using the OpenMetaAnalyst software. Results: Prevalence of current burnout was extracted from 24 studies encompassing 17,431 medical students. Among them, 8060 suffered from burnout and we estimated the prevalence to be 44.2% [33.4%–55.0%]. The information about the prevalence of each subset of burnout dimensions was given in nine studies including 7588 students. Current prevalence was estimated to be 40.8% for ‘emotional exhaustion’ [32.8%–48.9%], 35.1% [27.2%–43.0%] for ‘depersonalization’ and 27.4% [20.5%–34.3%] for ‘personal accomplishment’. There is no significant gender difference in burnout. The prevalence of burnout is slightly different across countries with a higher prevalence in Oceania and the Middle East than in other continents. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that one student out of two is suffering from burnout, even before residency. Again, our findings highlight the high level of distress in the medical population. These results should encourage the development of preventive strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Auslender, 2017, Omerta à l’hôpital: le livre noir des maltraitances faites aux étudiants en santé
  2. Olie, 2016, Le burn-out, 349
  3. Enzmann, 1995, The validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in three national samples. Health Work, Aids Res Interv Curr Issues Burn Response, 131
  4. Maslach, 1986, Maslach burnout inventory: manual
  5. 10.5867/medwave.2016.03.6432 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 568

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Frajerman, A., Morvan, Y., Krebs, M.-O., Gorwood, P., & Chaumette, B.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Chaumette, Boris
ORCID
Venue
European Psychiatry
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2019-01
Volume
55
Pages
36-42
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
DOI
10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006
OpenAlex
W2899346938
Semantic Scholar
458d8e6bc24d6f86ea99cc9035e53b8a3d990019
Cited by
568
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 14
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives project (Talent program)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, medical students, prevalence, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, gender differences, cross-national comparison, preventive strategies
MeSH terms
Burnout, Psychological, Emotions, Humans, Internship and Residency, Sex Factors, Students, Medical, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review