Cited by 287Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Professional burnout among medical students: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Erschens, Rebecca, Keifenheim, Katharina Eva, Herrmann-Werner, Anne, Loda, Teresa, Schwille-Kiuntke, Juliane, Bugaj, Till Johannes, Nikendei, Christoph, Huhn, Daniel +2 more·2019·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize the available evidence on the prevalence of professional burnout among medical students. METHODS: The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles, reporting burnout among medical students published between 2000 and 2017. The meta-analysis was conducted on the available data on burnout rates in medical students measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS). RESULTS: Fifty-eight out of 3006 studies were found eligible for inclusion. Twelve of these studies met the criteria for meta-analysis. Weighted mean values for the three sub-dimensions of the MBI-HSS were M = 22.93 (SD = 10.25) for Emotional Exhaustion, M = 8.88 (SD = 5.64) for Depersonalization, and M = 35.11 (SD = 8.03) for Personal Accomplishment. Prevalence rates for professional burnout ranged from 7.0% to 75.2%, depending on country-specific factors, applied instruments, cutoff-criteria for burnout symptomatology. CONCLUSION: This review underlines the burden of burnout among medical students. Future research should explicitly focus on specific context factors and student group under investigation. Such efforts are necessary to control for context-dependent confounders in research on medical students' mental health impairment to enable more meaningful comparisons and adequate prevention strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2018.1457213

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erschens, R., Keifenheim, K. E., Herrmann-Werner, A., Loda, T., Schwille-Kiuntke, J., Bugaj, T. J., Nikendei, C., Huhn, D., Zipfel, S., & Junne, F.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany;
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Medical Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
Corresponding author
Erschens, Rebecca
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2018-04-14
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
172-183
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2797183071
Cited by
287
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Competence Centre for the Prevention of Mental and Psychosomatic Disorders in Work and Educational Settings
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • University of Tübingen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
professional burnout, medical students, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, Maslach Burnout Inventory, burnout prevalence, student mental health, burnout prevention
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Depersonalization, Emotions, Humans, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Students, Medical, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review