Cited by 185Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Final Analysis of the Ipilimumab Versus Placebo Following Radiotherapy Phase III Trial in Postdocetaxel Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Identifies an Excess of Long-term Survivors

Open access
Fizazi, Karim, Drake, Charles G., Beer, Tomasz M., Kwon, Eugene D., Scher, Howard I., Gerritsen, Winald R., Bossi, Alberto, den Eertwegh, Alfons J.M. van +17 more·2020·European Urology

Abstract

Background The phase 3 trial CA184-043 evaluated radiotherapy to bone metastases followed by Ipilimumab or placebo in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel previously. In a prior analysis, the trial's primary endpoint (overall survival [OS]) was not improved significantly.Objective To report the final analysis of OS.Design, setting, and participants A total of 799 patients were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy to one or more bone metastases followed by either Ipilimumab (n = 399) or placebo (n = 400).Outcome measurements and statistical analysis OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified and exploratory subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed.Results and limitations During an additional follow-up of approximately 2.4 yr since the primary analysis, 721/799 patients have died. Survival analysis showed crossing of the curves at 7-8 mo, followed by persistent separation of the curves beyond that point, favoring the ipilimumab arm. Given the lack of proportional hazards, a piecewise hazard model showed that the hazard ratio (HR) changed over time: the HR was 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.99) for 0-5 mo, 0.66 (0.51, 0.86) for 5-12 mo, and 0.66 (0.52, 0.84) beyond 12 mo. OS rates were higher in the ipilimumab versus placebo arms at 2 yr (25.2% vs 16.6%), 3 yr (15.3% vs 7.9%), 4 yr (10.1% vs 3.3%), and 5 yr (7.9% vs. 2.7%). Disease progression was the most frequent cause of death in both arms. In seven patients (1.8%) in the ipilimumab arm and one (0.3%) in the placebo arm, the primary cause of death was reported as study drug toxicity. No long-term safety signals were identified.Conclusions In this preplanned long-term analysis, OS favored ipilimumab plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus radiotherapy for patients with postdocetaxel mCRPC. OS rates at 3, 4, and 5 yr were approximately two to three times higher in the ipilimumab arm.Patient summary After longer follow-up, survival favored the group of men who received ipilimumab, with overall survival rates being two to three times higher at 3 yr and beyond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.032

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase III trial of anti-CTLA4 plus radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer failed to meet its primary endpoint.

    “Similarly, a phase III combination study of anti-CTLA4 plus radiotherapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer also failed to meet its primary endpoint (100, 107).”

    From The Next Decade of Immune Checkpoint Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fizazi, K., Drake, C. G., Beer, T. M., Kwon, E. D., Scher, H. I., Gerritsen, W. R., Bossi, A., den Eertwegh, A. J. M. V., Krainer, M., Houede, N., Santos, R., Mahammedi, H., Ng, S., Danielli, R., Franke, F. A., Sundar, S., Agarwal, N., Bergman, A. M., Ciuleanu, T. E., Korbenfeld, E., Sengeløv, L., Hansen, S., McHenry, M. B., Chen, A., & Logothetis, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Vienna General Hospital (AT)
  • Centre Jean Perrin (FR)
  • St John of God Subiaco Hospital (AU)
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Hospital São José do Avaí (BR)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
  • Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
  • Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fizazi, Karim
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
822-830
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049720236
Cited by
185
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 9
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Urology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, docetaxel, overall survival, long-term survival, immune checkpoint inhibitors, disease progression, treatment toxicity, prognostic factors, prognostic score
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Ipilimumab, Docetaxel, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review