Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update

Open access
Ljungberg, Börje, Albiges, Laurence, Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin, Bedke, Jens, Capitanio, Umberto, Dabestani, Saeed, Fernández-Pello, Sergio, Giles, Rachel H., Hofmann, Fabian, Hora, Milan, Klatte, Tobias, Kuusk, Teele, Lam, Thomas B., Marconi, Lorenzo, Powles, Thomas, Tahbaz, Rana, Volpe, Alessandro, Bex, Axel·2022·European Urology

Abstract

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2022 RCC guideline, which is based on a standardised methodology including systematic reviews (SRs) and provides transparent and reliable evidence for the management of RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the 2022 update, a new literature search was carried out with a cutoff date of May 28, 2021, covering the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The data search focused on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled comparator-arm studies, SRs, and meta-analyses. Evidence synthesis was conducted using modified GRADE criteria as outlined for all the EAU guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All chapters of the RCC guideline were updated on the basis of a structured literature assessment, and clinical practice recommendations were developed. The majority of the studies included were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts and were based on single- or multi-institution data or national registries. The exception was systemic treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there are several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations that are based on higher levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The 2022 RCC guidelines have been updated by a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2022. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology panel for guidelines on kidney cancer has thoroughly evaluated the research data available to establish up-to-date international standards for the care of patients with kidney cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 1,508

Metadata

Authors
Ljungberg, B., Albiges, L., Abu-Ghanem, Y., Bedke, J., Capitanio, U., Dabestani, S., Fernández-Pello, S., Giles, R. H., Hofmann, F., Hora, M., Klatte, T., Kuusk, T., Lam, T. B., Marconi, L., Powles, T., Tahbaz, R., Volpe, A., & Bex, A.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
399-410
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220685687
Cited by
1,508
References
46
FWCI
183.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006
The paper
Ljungberg, B., Albiges, L., Abu-Ghanem, Y., Bedke, J., Capitanio, U., Dabestani, S., Fernández-Pello, S., Giles, R. H., Hofmann, F., Hora, M., Klatte, T., Kuusk, T., Lam, T. B., Marconi, L., Powles, T., Tahbaz, R., Volpe, A., & Bex, A. (2022). European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.