CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and Access

An evaluation of a tailored care program for complex and persistent mental health problems: Partners in Recovery program

Open access
Gulliver, Amelia, Morse, Alyssa R., Wilson, Niah, Sargent, Ginny, Banfield, Michelle·2018·Evaluation and Program Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Partners in Recovery (PIR) is a nation-wide Australian program designed to improve coordinated care for people with severe and persistent mental health problems. This study evaluated PIR's effectiveness for individual and system-level outcomes. A total of 25 PIR participants (male = 7, female = 15, not stated = 3) provided data for the evaluation of the program across six community mental health service providers in Canberra, Australia. Individual-level measures included quality of life, social inclusion, and perceptions of recovery. System-level individual measures included confidence in the health system, perceptions of organisation of care, and network analyses. Global single-item scores were measured at baseline (retrospectively), midpoint, and endpoint. Scaled scores for quality of life and social inclusion were measured at midpoint and endpoint only. Multi-level fixed effect models demonstrated significant improvements in global quality of life (p = .008), social inclusion (p = .025), perceptions of recovery (p < .001), and confidence in the health system (p = .013) from baseline to endpoint. Mean scaled scores did not improve from midpoint to endpoint. Two network analyses demonstrated the central role of the support facilitator. This study provides preliminary evidence for increasing quality of life, level of social inclusion, and perceptions of recovery for people with severe mental illness and complex needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coordination of services in the Partners in Recovery program was effective in meeting participants' health and social needs and improving their overall psychosocial functioning.

    “Further, the coordination of services in the Partners in Recovery program was effective in meeting participants' health and social needs, improving their overall psychosocial functioning (Urbis 2015; Gulliver et al. 2018;Hancock et al. 2018;Isaacs et al. 2019).”

    From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Gulliver et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Gulliver, A., Morse, A. R., Wilson, N., Sargent, G., & Banfield, M.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gulliver, Amelia
ORCID
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
68
Pages
99-107
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.001
OpenAlex
W2792018913
Cited by
6
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Capital Health Network, the Lead Agency for Partners in Recovery in the ACT
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
severe and persistent mental illness, complex mental health needs, care coordination, quality of life, social inclusion, community mental health services, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review