Cited by 504Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

People living with psychotic illness in 2010: the second Australian national survey of psychosis

Open access
Morgan, Vera A, Waterreus, Anna, Jablensky, Assen, Mackinnon, Andrew, McGrath, John J, Carr, Vaughan, Bush, Robert, Castle, David +9 more·2012·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 2010 Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) is Australia's second national psychosis survey. This paper provides an overview of its findings, including comparisons with the first psychosis survey and general population data. METHODS: The survey covered 1.5 million people aged 18-64 years, approximately 10% of Australians in this age group. A two-phase design was used. In phase 1, screening for psychosis took place in public mental health services and non-government organizations supporting people with mental illness. In phase 2, 1825 of those screen-positive for psychosis were randomly selected and interviewed. Data collected included symptomatology, substance use, functioning, service utilization, medication use, education, employment, housing, and physical health including fasting blood samples. RESULTS: The estimated 1-month treated prevalence of psychotic disorders in public treatment services was 3.1 people per 1000 population; the 12-month treated prevalence was 4.5 people per 1000. The majority (63.0%) of participants met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. One-half (49.5%) reported attempting suicide in their lifetime and two-thirds (63.2%) were rated as impaired in their ability to socialize. Over half (54.8%) had metabolic syndrome. The proportion currently smoking was 66.1%. Educational achievement was low. Only 21.5% were currently employed. Key changes in the 12 years since the first survey included: a marked drop in psychiatric inpatient admissions; a large increase in the proportion attending community mental health clinics; increased use of rehabilitation services and non-government organizations supporting people with mental illness; a major shift from typical to atypical antipsychotics; and large increases in the proportions with lifetime alcohol or drug abuse/dependence. CONCLUSION: People with psychotic illness face multiple challenges. An integrated approach to service provision is needed to ensure that their living requirements and needs for social participation are met, in addition to their very considerable mental and physical health needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867412449877

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Furthermore, an emphasis on availability of basic needs as exemplified in the theme "Economic recovery" was also found to be a key concern for users in the review conducted by (91) and the Australian National Survey of Psychotic Illness (92).

    “Furthermore, an emphasis on availability of basic needs as exemplified in the theme “Economic recovery” was also found to be a key concern for users in the review conducted by (91) and the Australian National Survey of Psychotic Illness (92).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, V. A., Waterreus, A., Jablensky, A., Mackinnon, A., McGrath, J. J., Carr, V., Bush, R., Castle, D., Cohen, M., Harvey, C., Galletly, C., Stain, H. J., Neil, A. L., McGorry, P., Hocking, B., Shah, S., & Saw, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Ramsay Health Care (Australia) (AU)
  • Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
  • Health Economics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
  • SANE Australia, Melbourne, Australia
  • Australian Government (AU)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-06-13
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
735-752
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2004149548
Cited by
504
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 15
FWCI
27.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
psychosis, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, prevalence, lifetime suicide attempts, social functioning, metabolic syndrome, smoking, substance use, employment, psychiatric hospital admissions, community mental health services, atypical antipsychotics, rehabilitation services, non-governmental organizations, physical health, Australia
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Australia, Catchment Area, Health, Female, Health Surveys, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Random Allocation, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Antipsychotic Agents, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders, International Classification of Diseases, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review