Cited by 27Virus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Transduction of the inner mouse retina using AAVrh8 and AAVrh10 via intravitreal injection

Open access
Giove, Thomas J., Sena-Esteves, Miguel, Eldred, William D.·2010·Experimental Eye Research

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a proven, safe and effective vector for gene delivery in the retina. There are over 100 serotypes of AAV, and AAV2 through AAV9 have been evaluated in the retina. Each AAV serotype has different cell tropism and transduction efficiency. Intravitreal injections of AAV into the eye tend to transduce cells in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), while subretinal injections tend to transduce retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors. Efficient transduction of the inner retina beyond the GCL is not well established with the current methodologies and serotypes used to date. In this study, we compared the cellular tropism of AAVrh8 and AAVrh10 vectors encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) using intravitreal injections. We found that AAVrh8 largely transduced cells in the GCL and also amacrine cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL), as well as Müller and horizontal cells. Inner retinal transduction with AAVrh10 was similar to AAVrh8, but AAVrh10 appeared to also transduce bipolar cells. The transduction efficiency as measured by the intensity of EGFP signal was 3.5 fold higher in horizontal cells transduced with AAVrh10 than AAVrh8. Glial fibrillary accessory protein (GFAP) levels were increased in Müller cells in transduced areas for both serotypes. The results of this study suggest that AAVrh8 and AAVrh10 may be excellent vector candidates to deliver genetic material to the INL, particularly for amacrine and horizontal cells, however they may also cause cellular stress as shown by increased glial GFAP expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exer.2010.08.011

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intravitreal injection of rAAVrh-10 shifted infection from mainly INL cells towards photoreceptor and RPE cells in Rs1 KO and Rho KO mice (XLRS and RP models, respectively) compared to wild-type mice.

    “Intravitreal injection of rAAVrh-10 shifted infection from mainly INL cells towards photoreceptor and RPE cells in Rs1 KO and Rho KO mice (XLRS and RP models, respectively) compared to wild-type mice [310,311].”

    From Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors (rAAV)-Vector Elements in Ocular Gene Therapy Clinical Trials and Transgene Expression and Bioactivity Assays (2020) · cites this paper as [311]

    The Results section (page not available in our copy) reports that intravitreal AAVrh10 transduced INL cells and appeared to transduce some photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium. It does not report experiments in Rs1 KO or Rho KO mice or a shift in transduction relative to wild-type mice; searches for those models and the comparison found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giove, T. J., Sena-Esteves, M., & Eldred, W. D.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Experimental Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
652-659
ISSN
0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074694316
Cited by
27
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY004785, EY004758)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, AAVrh10, AAV serotypes, inner retina, intravitreal injection, retinal gene delivery, ganglion cell layer, inner nuclear layer, amacrine cells, horizontal cells, Müller cells, bipolar cells, glial fibrillary acidic protein, transduction efficiency, cell tropism
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Injections, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Retina, Transduction, Genetic, Vitreous Body, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, Viral Tropism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review