Cited by 66Glaucoma and retinal disordersNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Neuroprotection for glaucoma: Requirements for clinical translation

Open access
Levin, Leonard A., Crowe, Megan E., Quigley, Harry A., Cordeiro, M. Francesca, Donoso, Larry A., Liao, Y. Joyce, Libby, Richard T., Masland, Richard H. +3 more·2017·Experimental Eye Research

Abstract

Within the field of glaucoma research, neuroprotection is defined as slowing the functional loss in glaucoma by a mechanism independent of lowering of intraocular pressure. There is currently a great potential for research surrounding neuroprotection as it relates to glaucoma. Anatomical targets for neuroprotection should focus on upstream rather than downstream factors, and could include any part of the retinal ganglion cell, the glia, especially astrocytes or Muller cells, and vasculature. The great number of anatomical targets is exceeded only by the number of possible biochemical pathways and potential treatments. Successful treatment may be accomplished through the targeting of one or even a combination of multiple pathways. Once a treatment is shown effective in vitro, it should be evaluated in vivo with carefully chosen animal models and studied in sufficient numbers to detect statistically and clinically significant effects. Such a drug should have few systemic side effects and its delivery should be optimized so as to encourage compliance. There are still a multitude of possible screens available to test the efficacy of a neuroprotective drug and a single gold standard is ideal for the accurate assessment and comparison of new drugs. Future studies in neuroprotection should investigate the genetic component of the disease, novel pharmaceutical agents for new or known pathways, modulations of scleral biomechanics, and relation to research of other complex disorders of the central nervous system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exer.2016.12.005

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is the first example of vision loss reversal after glaucomatous injury has occurred.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first example of vision loss reversal after glaucomatous injury has occurred, with previous attempts focusing on neuroprotection delivered at an early stage to prevent further disease progression41,42 (Supplementary discussion).”

    From Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision (2020) · cites this paper as [42]

    Section 2 (page unavailable) defines glaucoma neuroprotection as slowing functional loss and disease progression rather than reversing it. Section 7 discusses intervening at an early level of retinal ganglion cell injury, but the paper does not establish that previous attempts were delivered at an early stage. The citing authors’ assertion that their result is the first reversal is their own claim, not the part this citation supports. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, L. A., Crowe, M. E., Quigley, H. A., Cordeiro, M. F., Donoso, L. A., Liao, Y. J., Libby, R. T., Masland, R. H., Nickells, R. W., Sieving, P. A., & Sommer, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Leonard A.
Venue
Experimental Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
157
Pages
34-37
ISSN
0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560420095
Cited by
66
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lasker Foundation
  • International Retinal Research Foundation
  • NIH (R21EY025074, P30EY016665, R01EY002120)
  • Canada Research Chair program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
glaucoma, neuroprotection, retinal ganglion cells, astrocytes, Müller cells, retinal vasculature, glaucoma animal model, drug delivery, drug screening, scleral biomechanics, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Neuroprotection, Animals, Astrocytes, Axons, Glaucoma, Humans, Optic Nerve Diseases, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Neuroprotective Agents, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review