Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric properties of a computerized and hand-reaction time tests in older adults using long-term facilities with and without mild cognitive impairment

Ferreira, Soraia, Raimundo, Armando, del Pozo-Cruz, Jesus, Marmeleira, José·2021·Experimental Gerontology
DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Callisaya, M., Blizzard, L., Schmidt, M., McGinley, J., Lord, S., & Srikanth, V. (2009). A population-based study of sensorimotor factors affecting gait in older people. Age Ageing, 38(3). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19264860. · DOI
  2. Chen, 2017, Cognitive decline and slower reaction time in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment, Psychogeriatrics, 17, 364, 10.1111/psyg.12247 · DOI
  3. Guerreiro, 1994, Adaptação à população portuguesa da tradução do Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rev. Port. Neurol., 3, 9
  4. Hopkins, 2000, Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science, Sports Med., 30, 1, 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lord, 2003, Differing Risk Factors for Falls in Nursing Home and Intermediate-Care Residents Who Can and Cannot Stand Unaided, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 1645, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51518.x · DOI
  6. Lord, 2018, Aging, vol. 159, 157, 10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00010-0 · DOI
  7. Marmeleira, 2017, Physical activity and physical fitness of nursing home residents with cognitive impairment: a pilot study, Exp. Gerontol., 100, 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.025 · DOI
  8. Menz, 2003, Age-related differences in walking stability, Age Ageing, 32, 137, 10.1093/ageing/32.2.137 · DOI
  9. Mercer, 2009, Reliability and validity of a clinical test of reaction time in older adults, J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther., 32, 103, 10.1519/00139143-200932030-00004 · DOI
  10. Mirelman, 2012, Executive function and falls in older adults: New findings from a five-year prospective study link fall risk to cognition, PLoS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0040297 · DOI
  11. Rebok, G. W., Ball, K., Guey, L. T., Jones, R. N., Kim, H.-Y., King, J. W., … Willis, S. L. (2014). Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 62(1), 16–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12607. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ries, J. D., Echternach, J. L., Nof, L., & Gagnon Blodgett, M. (2009). Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed “up & go” test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease. Phys. Ther., 89(6), 569–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080258. · DOI
  13. Rossi, G., Malaguti, A., & Del Rossi, S. (2014). Practice effects associated with repeated assessment of a clinical test of reaction time. J. Athl. Train., 49(3), 356–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6059-49.2.04. · DOI
  14. van Schooten, 2019, Catch the ruler: concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of the ReacStick measures of reaction time and inhibitory executive function in older people, Aging Clin. Exp. Res., 31, 1147, 10.1007/s40520-018-1050-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Šerbetar, 2015, Establishing some measures of absolute and relative reliability of a motor tests, Croatian Journal of Education, 17, 37
  16. Shimizu, 2018, The effect of gait speed and gait phase to the allocation of attention during dual task gait, J. Phys. Ther. Sci., 30, 419, 10.1589/jpts.30.419 · DOI
  17. Sturnieks, 2012, Sensorimotor and neuropsychological correlates of force perturbations that induce stepping in older adults, Gait Posture, 36, 356, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.007 · DOI
  18. Terwee, 2007, Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Tun, 2008, Age differences in reaction time and attention in a National Telephone Sample of adults: education, sex, and task complexity matter, Dev. Psychol., 44, 1421, 10.1037/a0012845 · DOI
  20. University of Cambridge
  21. Wang, 2016, Evaluating the fall risk among elderly population by choice step reaction test, Clin. Interv. Aging, 11, 1075, 10.2147/CIA.S106606 · DOI
  22. Weir, 2005, Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Ferreira, S., Raimundo, A., del Pozo-Cruz, J., & Marmeleira, J.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
147
Pages
111271
ISSN
0531-5565
DOI
10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271
Cited by
14
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychometric properties of a computerized and hand-reaction time tests in older adults using long-term facilities with and without mild cognitive impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271
The paper
Ferreira, S., Raimundo, A., del Pozo-Cruz, J., & Marmeleira, J. (2021). Psychometric properties of a computerized and hand-reaction time tests in older adults using long-term facilities with and without mild cognitive impairment. Experimental Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.