Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial and temporal gene expression profiling of the contused rat spinal cord

AIMONE, J, LEASURE, J, PERREAU, V, THALLMAIR, M, THECHRISTOPHERREEVEPARALYSISFOUNDA·2004·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Microarray technology was used to examine gene expression changes following contusive injury of the adult rat spinal cord. To obtain a global understanding of the changes triggered by the injury, differential gene expression was examined spatially, using tissue samples from the epicenter of injury as well as 1 cm rostral and 1 cm caudal to the epicenter, and temporally, at 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 35 days post-injury. To filter out gene expression changes that were due to the laminectomy, samples of contused tissue were compared to laminectomy-only controls. We took advantage of four different, complementary methods of data analysis to detect differentially expressed genes. We have identified functional groups of genes that are differentially regulated in our model, including those associated with apoptosis, cell cycle, inflammation, and cholesterol metabolism. Our analysis has led to the identification of novel potential therapeutic targets within each group of genes that is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.05.042

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
AIMONE, J., LEASURE, J., PERREAU, V, THALLMAIR, M., & THECHRISTOPHERREEVEPARALYSISFOUNDA
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
189
Issue
2
Pages
204-221
ISSN
0014-4886
Cited by
90
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review