Cited by 37Research in Cotton CultivationCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulation of the effect of pruning and topping on cotton growth using COTTON2K model

Yang, Yanmin, Ouyang, Zhu, Yang, Yonghui, Liu, Xiaojing·2008·Field Crops Research

Abstract

COTTON2K, like most other cotton production models, does not always adequately represent local growth conditions owing to the fact that it fails to take into account some indigenous cultivation practices. For instance, pruning and topping, a common practice for cotton cultivation in China is not included in the model simulation of COTTON2K. The objective of this research therefore was to: (1) modify COTTON2K source code and slot pruning and topping simulation switch on to the model, and (2) calibrate and validate the modified COTTON2K model with field data from pruning and topping cultivation practice. First, field collected data in 2003 and 2004 were compared between the treatments, with and without pruning and topping, and the COTTON2K source code updated with the 'pruning and topping' switch. This was followed by the calibration and validation of the updated model with field data and simulation of the effect of pruning and topping on cotton performance. It was noted from field observations that pruning and topping reduced total fruit sites, but at the same time, increased retained boll number, possibly due to significant reductions in abscised fruit sites. Though total dry matter production dropped, more dry matter allocation to reproductive organs, however, enhanced higher cotton lint yield in the pruning and topping treatment. Results of the modified model simulation showed that growth in the number of main-stem node ceased after topping. Furthermore, there was more biomass allocation to reproductive organs, such as green and open bolls under pruning and topping. Coefficient of determination above 0.8 for most of the growth factors was obtained in the calibration and validation processes under pruning and topping, a strong indication of the level of success of the model modification.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Baker, 1972, Simulation of growth and yield in cotton. I. Gross photosynthesis, respiration and growth, Crop Sci., 12, 431, 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200040010x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baker, D.N., Lambert, J.R., McKinion, J.M., 1983. GOSSYM: A Simulator of cotton crop growth and yield, South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin. No. 1089, Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN. pp. 201–203.
  3. Bennett, 1965, Influence of topping and side pruning on cotton yield and other characteristics, Agron. J., 67, 25, 10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700010009x · DOI
  4. Cheng, 2001, Review on the cotton development model and production management decision system., Shanxi Meteoro., 30
  5. Dai, 2003, Review on growth and application of cotton monopodial branches, China Cotton, 30, 2
  6. Dong, 1996, The Validation of GOSSYM in the condition of Huanghuaihai cotton region, Acta Gossypii Sin., 2, 164
  7. Guo, 1992, The research on the cotton high yield and quality models under water limit. I. The yield functional models with complex agricultural practices, Acta Gossypii Sin., 4, 31
  8. Hearn, 1994, OZCOT: A simulation model for cotton crop management, Agr. Syst., 44, 257, 10.1016/0308-521X(94)90223-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jones, 1974, Development of a nitrogen balance for cotton growth models: a first approximation, Crop Sci., 14, 541, 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040014x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kennedy, 1991, Chemical efficacy of early square removal and subsequent productivity of cotton, Crop Sci., 31, 791, 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030050x · DOI
  11. Kerby, 1986, Cotton fruiting modification with mepiquat chloride, Agron. J., 78, 907, 10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800050032x · DOI
  12. Kittock, 1977, Effect of topping pima cotton on lint yield and boll retention, Agron. J., 69, 65, 10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900010017x · DOI
  13. Kletter, 1982, Effects of fruiting form removal on cotton reproductive development, Field Crop Res., 5, 69, 10.1016/0378-4290(82)90007-7 · DOI
  14. Kumar, 2005, Effect of plant growth regulators on physiological components of yield in hybrid cotton, Indian J. Plant Physiol., 10, 187
  15. Liu, 1992, The primary study on the cotton growth and development model, Chin. J. Agrometeorol., 13, 10
  16. Ma, 2004, A study on the fitness of cotton on canopy regulated by topping under high yield condition, Sci. Agr. Sin., 37, 1843
  17. Obasi, 2005, Influence of topping, side branch pruning and hill spacing on growth and development of Cotton (Gossypium bartadense L.) in the southern Guinea Savanna location of Nigeria, J. Agr. Trop. Subtrop., 106, 155
  18. Pan, 1992, The research on the cotton development and yield model—CGSM, Acta Gossypii Sin., 4, 11
  19. Pan, 1997, Developed on contton growth and development model COTGROW. I. Photosynthesis and dry matter production and distribution., Acta Gossypii Sin., 9, 132
  20. Pan, 1999, Developed on cotton growth and development model COTGROW. II. Morphological development., Acta Gossypii Sin., 11, 174
  21. Pettigrew, 1994, Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton lint yield and yield component, Agron. J., 86, 731, 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040027x · DOI
  22. Qiu, 1998, The validation of GOSSYM: under the condition of Xinjiang cotton region, Acta Gossypii Sin., 10, 155
  23. Reddy, 1990, Temperature and mepiquat chloride effects on cotton canopy architecture, Agron. J., 82, 190, 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020004x · DOI
  24. Reddy, 1992, Mepequat Chloride and irrigation versus cotton growth and development, Agron. J., 84, 930, 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400060004x · DOI
  25. Siebert, 2006, Influence of plant density on cotton response to mepiquat chloride application, Agron. J., 98, 1634, 10.2134/agronj2006.0083 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2001, The validation of CottonPlus in the condition of Huanghuaihai cotton region—a case study in Quzhou county, Hebei province., Acta Gossypii Sin., 13, 161, 10.1007/s101149900019 · DOI
  27. Wu, 1988, Study of Simulation model of growth and development of Cotton, Acta Ecol. Sin., 8, 201
  28. Xu, 2001, Regularity of accumulation and distribution of dry matter in monopodial branches retained cotton plants, J. Agr. Sci., 17, 153
  29. Yang, 2005, Application of COTTON2K in the precision planting management of cotton in Xinjiang, Chin. J. Eco Agr., 13, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Ouyang, Z., Yang, Y., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN)
Corresponding author
Ouyang, Zhu
Venue
Field Crops Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
126-137
ISSN
0378-4290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984682353
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Field Crops Research (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
cotton, pruning, topping, crop growth simulation, model calibration and validation, boll number, biomass allocation, lint yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review