Cited by 47Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesMedicinal Plant Research

In vitro screening of essential oil from young and mature leaves of Artemisia scoparia compared to its major constituents for free radical scavenging activity

Singh, Harminder Pal, Kaur, Shalinder, Mittal, Sunil, Batish, Daizy R., Kohli, Ravinder K.·2010·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

The present study investigated the chemical characterization, and antioxidant activity of essential oil hydrodistilled from young and mature leaves of Artemisia scoparia. GC-MS analyses revealed a monoterpenoid nature (64-67%) with 44 and 31 constituents in young and mature leaves oil, respectively. The oil from young leaf contained greater amount of oxygenated compounds. Beta-myrcene (24.13%) and p-cymene (27.06%) were the major constituents in young and mature leaves oil, respectively. A. scoparia leaf oils (25-200 microg/ml) exhibited a strong 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity against hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide. However, the activities of major constituent monoterpenes, beta-myrcene and p-cymene, were less. In general, the DPPH radical scavenging and antioxidant activity was in the order: mature leaf oil > young leaf oil > beta-myrcene > p-cymene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2010.01.017

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ageratum scoparia young and mature leaf oils displayed high hydroxyl radical scavenging; main constituents β-myrcene and p-cymene had much less activity than oils; mature leaf oils were more effective antioxidants than young leaf oils by DPPH.

    “The oils from young and mature leaves of Ageratum scoparia Waldst. & Kit. displayed a high degree of hydroxyl radical scavenging activity. However, the scavenging activity of principle constituents, β-myrcene and p-cymene, was very less compared to that of oils. The same authors [83] also evaluated the antioxidant activity of the samples by the DPPH method and also reported less activity of the”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, H. P., Kaur, S., Mittal, S., Batish, D. R., & Kohli, R. K.
Affiliations
Panjab University (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Harminder Pal
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1040-1044
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064527784
Cited by
47
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
Artemisia scoparia, essential oils, young leaves, mature leaves, antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging, myrcene, p-cymene, monoterpenes, DPPH radical scavenging, hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, leaf age
MeSH terms
Aging, Chlorophyll, Hydrogen Peroxide, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Plant Oils, Plant Proteins, Free Radical Scavengers, Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances, Plant Leaves, Artemisia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review