Usage pattern of personal care products in California households
Abstract
Given the concern over the potential for health risks associated with certain ingredients (e.g., phthalates) in personal care products, usage patterns of ∼30 types of personal care products (e.g., shampoo, sunscreen, fragrance, etc.) were collected in 604 California households through a telephone interview. Preferences in selecting products, e.g., scented or unscented, aerosol, and brand loyalty, were also investigated. Participants were recruited in three age groups, children (mostly preschoolers), their parents, and adults age 55 or older. Use frequencies of various product types varied by sex, age group, race, education, and climatic region. Product use by parent and child from the same household were correlated. Use frequencies of products in the same class (e.g., skincare) were moderately correlated, which may impact aggregate exposures. Use frequencies observed in this study were generally in the same range as those reported in the EPA Exposure Factor Handbook, but we found differences for some individual products. Our study provides additional data on population-based usage patterns of a large collection of commonly used personal care products pertaining to several age groups and socio-demographic strata. This information will be valuable for exposure and risk assessments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that education level correlates with frequency and amount of sunscreen use is concordant with a US study.
“The results of this survey showing education level correlating with the frequency and amount of sunscreen use is concordant with the US study2”
From Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Cosmetics in Koreans Visiting Dermatology Clinics (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental distribution of personal care products and their effects on human health
Khalid (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.22037/ijpr.2021.114891.15088 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Consumption and exposure to finished cosmetic products: a systematic review
Ficheux, A.-S., Gomez-Berrada, M.-P., Roudot, A.-C., & Ferret, P.-J. (2019) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.060 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Cosmetics in Koreans Visiting Dermatology Clinics
Cho, S., Oh, S., Kim, N. I., Ro, Y. S., Kim, J. S., Park, Y. M., Park, C. W., Lee, W. J., Kim, D. K., Lee, D. W., et al. (2017) · Annals of Dermatology · doi:10.5021/ad.2017.29.2.180 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, X. (., Bennett, D. H., Ritz, B., Cassady, D. L., Lee, K., & Hertz-Picciotto, I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Bennett, Deborah H.
- Venue
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3109-3119
- ISSN
- 0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047630779
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Keywords
- personal care products, usage patterns, phthalates, brand loyalty, aerosol products, children's exposure, exposure assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Consumer Product Safety, Cosmetics, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review