Cited by 95Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Exposure to bisphenol A appears to impair hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial learning and memory

Kim, Mi Eun, Park, Hee Ra, Gong, Eun Ji, Choi, Seon Young, Kim, Hyung Sik, Lee, Jaewon·2011·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is widely used in the manufacture of plastics and epoxy resins, and is known to affect reproductive organ growth and development. However, the effects of BPA on hippocampal neurogenesis are unclear in young adult mice. Therefore, the present study was conducted to examine the effects of BPA on hippocampal neurogenesis and learning as well as memory performance in young adult mice. BPA (1, 5, and 20 mg/kg/day) was administered orally to mice for 2 weeks. It was found that high-dose BPA (20 mg/kg/day) decreased the number of newly generated cells in hippocampus, but that low-dose BPA (1 mg/kg) increased the survival of newly generated cells in hippocampi of young mice. Furthermore, high-dose BPA (20mg/kg/day) was found to impair learning and memory performance significantly. However, no significant differences were observed between high- and low-dose treated mice in terms of levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or reactive oxygen species production in hippocampus. In addition, BPA treatment did not induce neuronal loss or damage or astrocyte activation. These data suggest that exposure to BPA causes fluctuations in hippocampal neurogenesis in young adult mice that result in spatial learning and memory impairment via a BDNF-independent pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2011.09.017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M. E., Park, H. R., Gong, E. J., Choi, S. Y., Kim, H. S., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
Pusan National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jaewon
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
3383-3389
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050986988
Cited by
95
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Korea FDA (09182 NTP 599)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (20090083538)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
bisphenol A, hippocampal neurogenesis, spatial learning and memory, dose-dependent effects, young adult mice, reactive oxygen species, endocrine disruptors, plastic exposure
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Phenols, Reactive Oxygen Species, Maze Learning, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review