Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compound C inhibits hypoxic activation of HIF‐1 independent of AMPK

Emerling, Brooke M., Viollet, Benoit, Tormos, Kathryn V., Chandel, Navdeep S.·2007·FEBS Letters

Abstract

The key transcription factor that regulates the cellular responses to hypoxia is hypoxia inducible factor‐1 (HIF‐1). The signaling mechanisms that regulate the hypoxic activation of HIF‐1 are not fully understood. Our objective here was to test whether AMP‐activated kinase (AMPK) was an upstream regulator of HIF‐1. Our results show that AMPK is not required for the hypoxic activation of HIF‐1. Interestingly, the AMPK inhibitor, Compound C, inhibits the hypoxic activation of HIF‐1 independent of AMPK. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Compound C functions as a repressor of HIF‐1 by inhibiting respiration and suppressing mitochondrial generated ROS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.038

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00292-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/20459 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1059796 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1138 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1126/science.1088805 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1042/bj20030048 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00560-X · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.11.005 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cmet.2004.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1128/MCB.00166-06 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/carcin/bgh253 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M306104200 · DOI
  16. 10.1128/MCB.25.12.4853-4862.2005 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb19941.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0960-894X(02)00827-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Emerling, B. M., Viollet, B., Tormos, K. V., & Chandel, N. S.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-26
Volume
581
Issue
29
Pages
5727-5731
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
96
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review