CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hem-1: putting the "WAVE" into actin polymerization during an immune response

Park, Heon, Chan, Maia M., Iritani, Brian M.·2010·FEBS Letters
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.018PMC PMC3363972
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Most active processes by immune cells including adhesion, migration, and phagocytosis require the coordinated polymerization and depolymerization of filamentous actin (F‐actin), which is an essential component of the actin cytoskeleton. This review focuses on a newly characterized hematopoietic cell‐specific actin regulatory protein called hematopoietic protein‐1 [Hem‐1, also known as Nck‐associated protein 1‐like (Nckap1l or Nap1l)]. Hem‐1 is a component of the “WAVE [WASP (Wiskott‐Aldrich syndrome protein)‐family verprolin homologous protein]” complex, which signals downstream of activated Rac to stimulate F‐actin polymerization in response to immuno‐receptor signaling. Genetic studies in cell lines and in mice suggest that Hem‐1 regulates F‐actin polymerization in hematopoietic cells, and may be essential for most active processes dependent on reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in immune cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.018

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090347 · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101308 · DOI
  3. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101216 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.002 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.01.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1182/blood-2009-09-198127 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f30448 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nri2724 · DOI
  9. Williams D.A., 2000, Dominant negative mutation of the hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPase, Rac2, is associated with a human phagocyte immunodeficiency, Blood, 96, 1646
  10. 10.1084/jem.20080340 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.039 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/bies.20558 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nri2606 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrm1587 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1042/BC20060086 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.1099159 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/bies.20017 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1089709 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80519-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/79808 · DOI
  21. 10.1084/jem.194.7.903 · DOI
  22. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-132068 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.1088485 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.101546898 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nm1274 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00846.x · DOI
  27. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-226 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0400628101 · DOI
  29. 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1311 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.290.5492.801 · DOI
  31. 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1299 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/cm.20342 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.024 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0409120102 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M602389200 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature04976 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1242/jcs.013714 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/cm.20323 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1083/jcb.200509067 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nsmb.1587 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.036 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040038 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00580-3 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.024 · DOI
  45. 10.1083/jcb.200801121 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nrm2069 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/bies.200900123 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90109-Y · DOI
  49. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0414 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/gad.14.7.863 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/gad.955702 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.068 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.065 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050221 · DOI
  55. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0283 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600084 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.016 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nri1109 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nri2477 · DOI
  60. 10.1182/blood-2006-03-005942 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.02.005 · DOI
  62. 10.1083/jcb.200404166 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80019-9 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.4049/jimmunol.169.9.5043 · DOI
  65. 10.1084/jem.20030874 · DOI
  66. 10.1084/jem.192.1.77 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2397 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.170 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/88756 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.011 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.coi.2005.04.003 · DOI
  72. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006599 · DOI
  73. 10.1084/jem.194.7.915 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.03.022 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/ni1168 · DOI
  76. 10.1084/jem.190.9.1329 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00109-1 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/nrm2890 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.010 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00491.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Park, H., Chan, M. M., & Iritani, B. M.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-20
Volume
584
Issue
24
Pages
4923-4932
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
DOI
10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.018
PMC
PMC3363972
Cited by
36
References
3
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review