Cited by 347Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingCellular transport and secretion

Abi, Sra1, and Kette control the stability and localization of SCAR/WAVE to regulate the formation of actin-based protrusions

Open access
Kunda, Patricia, Craig, Gavin, Dominguez, Veronica, Baum, Buzz·2003·Current Biology

Abstract

Background In animal cells, GTPase signaling pathways are thought to generate cellular protrusions by modulating the activity of downstream actin-regulatory proteins. Although the molecular events linking activation of a GTPase to the formation of an actin-based process with a characteristic morphology are incompletely understood, Rac-GTP is thought to promote the activation of SCAR/WAVE, whereas Cdc42 is thought to initiate the formation of filopodia through WASP. SCAR and WASP then activate the Arp2/3 complex to nucleate the formation of new actin filaments, which through polymerization exert a protrusive force on the membrane. Results Using RNAi to screen for genes regulating cell form in an adherent Drosophila cell line, we identified a set of genes, including Abi/E3B1, that are absolutely required for the formation of dynamic protrusions. These genes delineate a pathway from Cdc42 and Rac to SCAR and the Arp2/3 complex. Efforts to place Abi in this signaling hierarchy revealed that Abi and two components of a recently identified SCAR complex, Sra1 (p140/PIR121/CYFIP) and Kette (Nap1/Hem), protect SCAR from proteasome-mediated degradation and are critical for SCAR localization and for the generation of Arp2/3-dependent protrusions. Conclusions In Drosophila cells, SCAR is regulated by Abi, Kette, and Sra1, components of a conserved regulatory SCAR complex. By controlling the stability, localization, and function of SCAR, these proteins may help to ensure that Arp2/3 activation and the generation of actin-based protrusions remain strictly dependant on local GTPase signaling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.005

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduction of Cyfip1 or fly Hspc300 affects the level of the other components of the WRC.

    “Indeed, it is reported that reduction of Cyfip1 or fly Hspc300 affects the level of the other components of the WRC (Kunda et al., 2003; Schenck et al., 2004; Abekhoukh and Bardoni, 2014; Gautier et al., 2011; Qurashi et al., 2007; De Rubeis et al., 2013).”

    From New insights into the regulatory function of CYFIP1 in the context of WAVE- and FMRP-containing complexes (2017) · cites this paper as Kunda et al., 2003

    The Results report that silencing fly Sra1 or HSPC300 reduced the level of SCAR, another WRC component. This supports the claim for SCAR, but the paper does not establish that levels of the other WRC components generally are affected, or test reduction of mammalian CYFIP1. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunda, P., Craig, G., Dominguez, V., & Baum, B.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Baum, Buzz
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
13
Issue
21
Pages
1867-1875
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054821269
Cited by
341
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
SCAR/WAVE complex, ABI, SR-A1, Arp2/3 complex, actin-based protrusions, filopodia, Cdc42, Rac, GTPase signaling, proteasomal degradation, protein localization, Drosophila cells, cell shape regulation, wasps
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cells, Cultured, Drosophila, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Microfilament Proteins, Pseudopodia, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Drosophila Proteins, RNA Interference, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review