The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of temperature effects on soil respiration and bacterial and fungal growth rates
Open accessAbstract
Temperature is an important factor regulating microbial activity and shaping the soil microbial community. Little is known, however, on how temperature affects the most important groups of the soil microorganisms, the bacteria and the fungi, in situ. We have therefore measured the instantaneous total activity (respiration rate), bacterial activity (growth rate as thymidine incorporation rate) and fungal activity (growth rate as acetate-in-ergosterol incorporation rate) in soil at different temperatures (0-45 degrees C). Two soils were compared: one was an agricultural soil low in organic matter and with high pH, and the other was a forest humus soil with high organic matter content and low pH. Fungal and bacterial growth rates had optimum temperatures around 25-30 degrees C, while at higher temperatures lower values were found. This decrease was more drastic for fungi than for bacteria, resulting in an increase in the ratio of bacterial to fungal growth rate at higher temperatures. A tendency towards the opposite effect was observed at low temperatures, indicating that fungi were more adapted to low-temperature conditions than bacteria. The temperature dependence of all three activities was well modelled by the square root (Ratkowsky) model below the optimum temperature for fungal and bacterial growth. The respiration rate increased over almost the whole temperature range, showing the highest value at around 45 degrees C. Thus, at temperatures above 30 degrees C there was an uncoupling between the instantaneous respiration rate and bacterial and fungal activity. At these high temperatures, the respiration rate closely followed the Arrhenius temperature relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming?
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006238902976 · Cited by 793
Cited by
Conant, R. T., Ryan, M. G., Ågren, G. I., Birge, H. E., Davidson, E. A., Eliasson, P. E., Evans, S. E., Frey, S. D., Giardina, C. P., Hopkins, F. M., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x · Cited by 1,635
The plant hypersensitive response: concepts, control and consequences
Balint‐Kurti, P. (2019) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12821 · Cited by 630
Thermal adaptation of decomposer communities in warming soils
Bradford, M. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00333 · Cited by 379
Koch, O., Tscherko, D., & Kandeler, E. (2007) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002983 · Cited by 377
Seed survival in soil: interacting effects of predation, dormancy and the soil microbial community
Dalling, J. W., Davis, A. S., Schutte, B. J., & Elizabeth Arnold, A. (2011) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01739.x · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Pietikåinen, J., Pettersson, M., & Bååth, E.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W1983728617
- Cited by
- 863
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of temperature effects on soil respiration and bacterial and fungal growth rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.002
- The paper
- Pietikåinen, J., Pettersson, M., & Bååth, E. (2005). Comparison of temperature effects on soil respiration and bacterial and fungal growth rates. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.