The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quorum-sensing control in Staphylococci â a target for antimicrobial drug therapy?
Abstract
Today, we find ourselves in an urgent need for novel antibacterial drugs, as many important human pathogens have acquired multiple antibiotic resistance factors. Among those, Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis play a major role as the leading sources of nosocomial infections. Recently, it has been suggested to develop therapeutics that attack bacterial virulence rather than kill bacteria. Such drugs are called "antipathogenic" and are believed to reduce the development of antibiotic resistance. Specifically, cell-density-dependent gene regulation (quorum-sensing) in bacteria has been proposed as a potential target. While promising reports exist about quorum-sensing blockers in gram-negative bacteria, the use of the staphylococcal quorum-sensing system as a drug target is now seen in an increasingly critical way. Inhibition of quorum-sensing in Staphylococcus has been shown to enhance biofilm formation. Furthermore, down-regulation or mutation of the Staphylococcus quorum-sensing system increases bacterial persistence in device-related infection, suggesting that interference with quorum-sensing would enhance rather than suppress this important type of staphylococcal disease. The chemical nature and biological function of another proposed staphylococcal quorum-sensing inhibitor, named "RIP", are insufficiently characterized. Targeting quorum-sensing systems might in principle constitute a reasonable way to find novel antibacterial drugs. However, as outlined here, this approach requires careful investigation in every specific pathogen and type of infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440102 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies
Cegelski, L., Marshall, G. R., Eldridge, G. R., & Hultgren, S. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1818 · Cited by 788
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Molecular Basis of In Vivo Biofilm Formation by Bacterial Pathogens
Joo, H.-S., & Otto, M. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.10.022 · Cited by 434
Self-citationOsteomyelitis and the role of biofilms in chronic infection
Brady, R. A., Leid, J. G., Calhoun, J. H., Costerton, J. W., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2008) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2007.00357.x · Cited by 400
Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management Strategies
Naber, C. K. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/598189 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Otto, M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-141
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6968
- OpenAlex
- W2095830310
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quorum-sensing control in Staphylococci â a target for antimicrobial drug therapy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.016
- The paper
- Otto, M. (2004). Quorum-sensing control in Staphylococci â a target for antimicrobial drug therapy? FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.