The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by wine yeast strains
Open accessAbstract
While unfermented grape must contains approximately equal amounts of the two hexoses glucose and fructose, wine producers worldwide often have to contend with high residual fructose levels (>2 gl(-1)) that may account for undesirable sweetness in finished dry wine. Here, we investigate the fermentation kinetics of glucose and fructose and the influence of certain environmental parameters on hexose utilisation by wine yeast. Seventeen Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, including commercial wine yeast strains, were evaluated in laboratory-scale wine fermentations using natural Colombard grape must that contained similar amounts of glucose and fructose (approximately 110 gl(-1) each). All strains showed preference for glucose, but to varying degrees. The discrepancy between glucose and fructose utilisation increased during the course of fermentation in a strain-dependent manner. We ranked the S. cerevisiae strains according to their rate of increase in GF discrepancy and we showed that this rate of increase is not correlated with the fermentation capacity of the strains. We also investigated the effect of ethanol and nitrogen addition on hexose utilisation during wine fermentation in both natural and synthetic grape must. Addition of ethanol had a stronger inhibitory effect on fructose than on glucose utilisation. Supplementation of must with assimilable nitrogen stimulated fructose utilisation more than glucose utilisation. These results show that the discrepancy between glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation is not a fixed parameter but is dependent on the inherent properties of the yeast strain and on the external conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Not your ordinary yeast: non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered
Jolly, N. P., Varela, C., & Pretorius, I. S. (2014) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/1567-1364.12111 · Cited by 861
Self-citationA review of selection criteria for starter culture development in the food fermentation industry
Vinicius De Melo Pereira, G., De Carvalho Neto, D. P., Junqueira, A. C. D. O., Karp, S. G., Letti, L. A. J., Magalhães Júnior, A. I., & Soccol, C. R. (2020) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2019.1630636 · Cited by 189
Low-Input Fermentations of Agave tequilana Leaf Juice Generate High Returns on Ethanol Yields
Corbin, K. R., Betts, N. S., van Holst, N., Jiranek, V., Chambers, D., Byrt, C. S., Fincher, G. B., & Burton, R. A. (2016) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9755-x · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- BERTHELS, N., CORDEROOTERO, R., BAUER, F., THEVELEIN, J., & PRETORIUS, I.
- Venue
- FEMS Yeast Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 683-689
- ISSN
- 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115425788
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by wine yeast strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005
- The paper
- BERTHELS, N., CORDEROOTERO, R., BAUER, F., THEVELEIN, J., & PRETORIUS, I. (2004). Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.