Cited by 55Endometriosis Research and TreatmentIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsGynecological conditions and treatments

Adhesion formation after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis and lysis of adhesions

Parker, Jason D., Sinaii, Ninet, Segars, James H., Godoy, Heidi, Winkel, Craig, Stratton, Pamela·2005·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate adhesion reformation after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis and adhesiolysis in women with chronic pelvic pain. Design Prospective clinical trial. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Thirty-eight women with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Intervention(s) A primary and second-look laparoscopy with adhesiolysis and excision of endometriotic lesions with a neodymium-yttrium argon garnet surgical laser technologies (SLT) contact laser. Main outcome measure(s) Adhesion formation and character (thin, thin and thick, or thick). Location of adhesions at a first laparoscopy was compared with de novo or reformation of adhesions and the location of adhesions at a second surgery. Result(s) Adhesions or adhesions combined with endometriotic lesions were significantly more likely to reform at second surgery compared with sites having only an endometriosis lesion. Thick adhesions were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of an adhesion reforming, compared with thin adhesions or thin and thick adhesions. Lesions or adhesions involving the ovary were more likely to be associated with adhesions at a subsequent surgery, compared with lesions in the adjacent ovarian fossa or fallopian tube. Conclusion(s) Most patients developed adhesions after radical surgical excision of endometriosis for pelvic pain. The high incidence of adhesion formation after surgery for endometriosis underscores the importance of optimizing surgical techniques to potentially reduce adhesion formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.057

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, J. D., Sinaii, N., Segars, J. H., Godoy, H., Winkel, C., & Stratton, P.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stratton, Pamela
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
1457-1461
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078699979
Cited by
55
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, adhesiolysis, adhesion formation, chronic pelvic pain, laparoscopic resection, second-look laparoscopy, ovarian involvement, postoperative adhesions
MeSH terms
Tissue Adhesions, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review