Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Open access
Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F., Luque-Ramírez, Manuel, González, Frank·2011·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To review and meta-analyse the studies evaluating the status of serum inflammatory markers in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in English before January 2010 and identified using the Entrez-PubMed engine. Setting Academic hospital Interventions Measurement of serum concentrations of inflammatory markers by high-sensitivity techniques. Main Outcome Measures Meta-analyses of the mean difference in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interlekin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) concentrations among patients with PCOS and appropriate controls, applying random-effects models to limit interstudy variability, and using appropriate estimates of evidence dissemination bias. Results Meta-analysis of the 31 articles meeting inclusion criteria showed that circulating CRP was 96% higher in women with PCOS compared to controls (95% confidence interval 71% – 122%, z = 7.32, p < 0.0001) without evidence dissemination bias (Egger’s regression intercept 0.45, 95% confidence interval −2.30 – 3.21, P = 0.739). These findings persisted after excluding five studies with mismatches in body mass and/or frequency of obesity between women with PCOS and controls. Meta-analyses involving 10 studies of IL-6, and 9 studies of TNF-α revealed no statistically significant differences between PCOS and controls. Conclusion Women with PCOS exhibit elevation in circulating CRP that is independent of obesity. This finding corroborates existing molecular evidence of the chronic low-grade inflammation that may underpin the pathogenesis of this disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.036

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 205 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Escobar-Morreale, H. F., Luque-Ramírez, M., & González, F.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
1048-1058.e2
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973239749
Cited by
517
References
205
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.036
The paper
Escobar-Morreale, H. F., Luque-Ramírez, M., & González, F. (2011). Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertility and Sterility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.