Cited by 6Health and Medical Research ImpactsEthics in Clinical ResearchReproductive Health and Technologies

Barriers to conducting clinical research in reproductive medicine around the world

Open access
Schlaff, William D.·2011·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

We asked seven senior and accomplished investigators from around the world to share their experiences conducting research in reproductive medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlaff, W. D.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Schlaff, William D.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
801
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976912440
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Global Health, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Reproductive Medicine, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review