Cited by 27Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

Use of fertility treatment modalities in a large United States cohort of professional women

Open access
Farland, Leslie V., Missmer, Stacey A., Rich-Edwards, Janet, Chavarro, Jorge E., Barbieri, Robert L., Grodstein, Francine·2014·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the use of fertility treatments among a large cohort of women in the United States.Design Cohort study.Setting Nurses' Health Study II.Patient(s) Ten thousand thirty-six women who reported having used fertility treatment on biennial questionnaires from 1993-2009.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Data on patterns of treatment modality were collected via self-report from validated mailed questionnaires. Information on clomiphene, gonadotropin injections alone, and gonadotropin injections as part of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) was queried.Result(s) Most women who reported fertility treatment used clomiphene (94%), with a large majority reporting clomiphene as their only form of treatment (73%). Of women who reported treatment more advanced than clomiphene, 13% had used gonadotropin injections alone, 11% IUI treatment, and 11% IVF. Several subgroups were more likely to use multiple treatment modalities and to initiate treatment with gonadotropins rather than clomiphene, including women living in states with insurance coverage of fertility procedures, with higher household income, younger in age, who remained nulliparous at the study close, and treated after 2000.Conclusion(s) Results should be interpreted cautiously, but to our knowledge, this represents the first study of fertility treatment patterns in the United States and could inform public health planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.016

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a validation study of 44 participants, all medical records that provided information on fertility treatment (74% of records) confirmed women's reported treatment.

    “In a validation study, we obtained medical records regarding fertility from 44 participants (with their signed permission); all of the records which provided information on fertility treatment (74% of the records) confirmed women’s reported treatment, while the remaining records generally contained no information on specific treatments and thus were difficult to interpret.(19)”

    From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farland, L. V., Missmer, S. A., Rich-Edwards, J., Chavarro, J. E., Barbieri, R. L., & Grodstein, F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Farland, Leslie V.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
101
Issue
6
Pages
1705-1710
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123903471
Cited by
27
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (UM1CA176726)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD59955, R21HD059955, T32HD060454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
infertility treatment, treatment patterns, clomiphene citrate, gonadotropin injection, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, professional women, household income, nulliparity, Nurses' Health Study II
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Clomiphene, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Fertility, Fertility Agents, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Financing, Personal, Gonadotropins, Humans, Income, Infertility, Female, Insemination, Artificial, Nurses, Parity, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Drug Utilization Review, Insurance Coverage, Health Care Surveys, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review