Fifty years of dart tag recoveries for tropical tuna: A global comparison of results for the western Pacific, eastern Pacific, Atlantic,and Indian Oceans
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The assumption of single Indian-wide stocks is based on results from the Indian Ocean Regional Tuna Tagging Program (RTTP-IO) that suggest rapid and large-scale movements of the three tropical species in the Indian Ocean.
“This assumption is based on the results obtained from the Indian Ocean Regional Tuna Tagging Program (RTTP-IO) that suggest rapid and large-scale movements of the three tropical species in the Indian Ocean (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Skipjack tagged in Tanzania showed the larger and fastest migrations (average distances of 1129 miles after one month at liberty), followed by skipjack tagged in Mozambique Channel (an average of 894 miles travelled).
“Skipjack tagged in Tanzania showed the larger and fastest migrations (e.g. average distances of 1129 miles after one month at liberty), followed by skipjack tagged in Mozambique Channel (an average of 894 miles travelled).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Fonteneau and Hallier (2015) advised that current tagging programs targeting tropical tuna may still not be adequate to estimate the potential stock mixing rates.
“Fonteneau and Hallier (2015) advised that current tagging programs 616 targeting tropical tuna, may still not be adequate to estimate the potential stock mixing rates.”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Short-term recoveries of yellowfin tuna were associated with relatively long distances (249 miles on average), about 5 times longer than the distances of short-term recoveries in other oceans.
“For instance, short-term recoveries were associated with relatively long distances (249 miles on average), about 5 times longer than the distances of short-term recoveries in other oceans (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Results from tagging programs describe fast and large-scale skipjack movements, with an average monthly distance of 1066 miles between tagging and recovery positions in the first year.
“Results obtained from these programs describe fast and large-scale skipjack movements, with an average monthly distance of 1066 miles between tagging and recovery positions in the first year (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Results obtained from the RTTP-IO describe fast and large-scale bigeye movements, with an average monthly distance between tagging and recovery positions of 918 miles in the first year, with distances increasing slowly in subsequent years.
“Results obtained from the RTTP-IO also describe fast and large-scale bigeye movements. The average monthly distance between tagging and recovery positions is 918 miles in the first year, with distances increasing slowly in subsequent years (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Despite rapid movements described for skipjack tuna tagged in the Mozambique Channel, most tagged tuna returned to this area within one year, coinciding with the March-May fishing season, a pattern recurrent over the studied years.
“Despite the rapid movements described for skipjack tuna tagged in the Mozambique Channel, most tagged tuna returned to this area within one year, coinciding with the March-May fishing season, a pattern that was recurrent over the studied years (Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015).”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Fonteneau and Hallier, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, J. M. I., Damerau, M., Matschiner, M., Jentoft, S., & Hanel, R. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx067 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“…of yellowfin tuna population structure has been controversial, as long-distance movements are known to occur in this highly migratory species (Itano and Williams 1992; Ortiz 2001; Fonteneau and Hallier 2015) which could potentially lead to a homogenization of between-ocean genetic differentiation.”
Background
- Authors
- Fonteneau, A., & Hallier, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Fonteneau, Alain
- Venue
- Fisheries Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 7-22
- ISSN
- 0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066803662
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- tag recovery, tropical tuna, skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, growth rate, longevity, movement patterns, stock assessment, western Pacific, eastern Pacific, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review