Cited by 60Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Fifty years of dart tag recoveries for tropical tuna: A global comparison of results for the western Pacific, eastern Pacific, Atlantic,and Indian Oceans

Fonteneau, Alain, Hallier, Jean-Pierre·2015·Fisheries Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.03.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fonteneau, A., & Hallier, J.-P.
Affiliations
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Fonteneau, Alain
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
163
Pages
7-22
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066803662
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
tag recovery, tropical tuna, skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, growth rate, longevity, movement patterns, stock assessment, western Pacific, eastern Pacific, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review