CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchMarine animal studies overview

Survival and transit of in-river and transported yearling Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River and estuary

Open access
Dietrich, Joseph, Eder, Kai, Thompson, Donald, Buchanan, Rebecca, Skalski, John, McMichael, Geoffrey, Fryer, Derek, Loge, Frank·2016·Fisheries Research
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.07.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.07.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These salmon have transit rates exceeding 50 km/d through the Columbia River estuary.

    “These salmon have transit rates exceeding 50 km/d (McMichael et al. 2010;Harnish et al. 2012;Dietrich et al. 2016)”

    From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in <scp>Main‐Stem</scp> Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Dietrich et al. 2016

    In Results §§3.3.1–3.3.2 (page not provided), median transit rates exceeded 50 km/d in the final Estuary-2 reach: 158 km/d for in-river fish and 140 km/d for barged fish. But in the preceding Estuary-1 reach, the respective rates were 49.8 and 23 km/d, so the source does not support the threshold throughout the estuary. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Clemens, B.J.; Clements, S.P.; Karnowski, M.D.; Jepsen, D.B.; Gitelman, A.I.; Schreck, C.B. 2009. Effects of transportation and other factors on survival estimates of juvenile salmonids in the unimpounded lower Columbia River. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 138:169- 188.
  2. Congleton, J.L.; LaVoie, W.J.; Schreck, C.B.; Davis, L.E. 2000. Stress indices in migrating juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead of wild and hatchery origin before and after barge transportation. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 129:946-961.
  3. Evans, A.F.; Hostetter, N.J.; Roby, D.D.; Collis, K.; Lyons, D.E.; Sandford, B.P.; Ledgerwood, R.D.; Sebring, S. 2012. Systemwide evaluation of avian predation on juvenile salmonids from the Columbia River based on recoveries of passive integrated transponder tags. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141:975-989.
  4. Ford, M.J. ed. 2011. Status review update for Pacific Salmon and steelhead listed under the Endangered Species Act: Northwest: U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NWFSC-113.
  5. Haeseker, S.L.; McCann, J.A.; Tuomikoski, J.; Chockley, B. 2012. Assessing Freshwater and Marine Environmental Influences on Life-Stage-Specific Survival Rates of Snake River Spring-Summer Chinook Salmon and Steelhead. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141:121-138.
  6. Hostetter, N.J.; Evans, A.F.; Roby, D.D.; Collis, K.; Hawbecker, M.; Sandford, B.P.; Thompson, D.E.; Loge, F.J. 2011. Relationship of External Fish Condition to Pathogen Prevalence and Out-Migration Survival in Juvenile Steelhead. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 140:1158-1171.
  7. Muir, W.D.; Marsh, D.M.; Sandford, B.P.; Smith, S.G.; Williams, J.G. 2006. Post-Hydropower System Delayed Mortality of Transported Snake River Stream-Type Chinook Salmon: Unraveling the Mystery. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135:1523-1534.
  8. Ryan, B.A.; Smith, S.G.; Butzerin, J.A.M.; Ferguson, J.W. 2003. Relative vulnerability to avian predation of juvenile salmonids tagged with passive integrated transponders in the Columbia River estuary, 1998-2000. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132:275-288.
  9. Schreck, C.B.; Stahl, T.P.; Davis, L.E.; Roby, D.D.; Clemens, B.J. 2006. Mortality estimates of juvenile spring-summer Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River and estuary, 1992-1998: evidence for delayed mortality? Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135:457- 475.
  10. Seber, G.A.F. 2002. The Estimation of Animal Abundance. Caldwell, New Jersey: Blackburn Press.
  11. Townsend, R.L.; Skalski, J.R.; Dillingham, P.; Steig, T.W. 2006. Correcting bias in survival estimation resulting from tag failure in acoustic and radiotelemetry studies. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 11:83-196.
  12. Ward, D.L.; Boyce, R.R.; Young, F.R.; Olney, F.E. 1997. A review and assessment of transportation studies for juvenile Chinook salmon in the Snake River. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 17:652-662.
  13. Ward, D.L.; Petersen, J.H.; Loch, J.J. 1995. Index of predation on juvenile salmonids by northern squawfish in the lower and middle Columbia River and in the lower Snake River. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 124:321-334. Citations: 10
  14. Clemens, B. J., S. P. Clements, M. D. Karnowski, D. B. Jepsen, A. I. Gitelman, and C. B. 15 Schreck. 2009. Effects of transportation and other factors on survival estimates of 16 juvenile salmonids in the unimpounded lower Columbia River. Transactions of the 17 American Fisheries Society 138(1):169-188.
  15. Harnish, R. A., G. E. Johnson, G. A. McMichael, M. S. Hughes, and B. D. Ebberts. 2012. Effect 19 of migration pathway on survival and travel time of acoustic-tagged juvenile salmonids in 20 the Columbia River estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:507- 21 519.
  16. McMichael, G., A. Hanson, R. Harnish, and D. Trott. 2013. Juvenile salmonid migratory 31 behavior at the mouth of the Columbia River and within the plume. Animal Biotelemetry 32 1(1):14.
  17. McMichael, G. A., M. B. Eppard, T. J. Carlson, J. A. Carter, B. D. Ebberts, R. S. Brown, M. A. 34 Weiland, G. R. Ploskey, R. A. Harnish, and Z. D. Deng. 2010a. The Juvenile Salmon 35 Acoustic Telemetry System: A new tool. Fisheries 35(1):9-22.
  18. McMichael, G. A., J. R. Skalski, and K. A. Deters. 2011b. Survival of juvenile Chinook salmon 45 during barge transport. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31(6):1187- 46 1196.
  19. Rechisky, E. L., D. W. Welch, A. D. Porter, M. C. Jacobs-Scott, and P. M. Winchell. 2013. 56 Influence of multiple dam passage on survival of juvenile Chinook salmon in the 57 Columbia River estuary and coastal ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of 58 Sciences of the United States of America 110(17):6883-6888.
  20. Rechisky, E. L., D. W. Welch, A. D. Porter, M. C. Jacobs, and A. Ladouceur. 2009. 63 Experimental measurement of hydrosystem-induced delayed mortality in juvenile Snake 64 River spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) using a large-scale acoustic 65 array. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66(7):1019-1024.
  21. Welch, D. W., E. L. Rechisky, M. C. Melnychuk, A. D. Porter, C. J. Walters, S. Clements, B. J. 71 Clemens, R. S. McKinley, and C. Schreck. 2008. Survival of migrating salmon smolts in 72 large rivers with and without dams. PLoS Biology 6(10):2101-2108. 73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dietrich, J., Eder, K., Thompson, D., Buchanan, R., Skalski, J., McMichael, G., Fryer, D., & Loge, F.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • United States Army Corps of Engineers (US)
Corresponding author
Loge, Frank
ORCID
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
183
Pages
435-446
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.fishres.2016.07.005
OpenAlex
W2497103069
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Fisheries Research (acceptedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
US Army Corps of Engineers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, emigration, survival, Lower Columbia River, estuaries, acoustic telemetry, time of arrival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review