Cited by 163Probiotics and Fermented FoodsSeed and Plant BiochemistryFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously-fermented buckwheat and teff sourdoughs

Moroni, Alice V., Arendt, Elke K., Bello, Fabio Dal·2011·Food Microbiology

Abstract

In this study, four different laboratory scale gluten-free (GF) sourdoughs were developed from buckwheat or teff flours. The fermentations were initiated by the spontaneous biota of the flours and developed under two technological conditions (A and B). Sourdoughs were propagated by continuous back-slopping until the stability was reached. The composition of the stable biota occurring in each sourdough was assessed using both culture-dependent and -independent techniques. Overall, a broad spectrum of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts species, belonging mainly to the genera Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Kazachstania and Candida, were identified in the stable sourdoughs. Buckwheat and teff sourdoughs were dominated mainly by obligate or facultative heterofermentative LAB, which are commonly associated with traditional wheat or rye sourdoughs. However, the spontaneous fermentation of the GF flours resulted also in the selection of species which are not consider endemic to traditional sourdoughs, i.e. Pediococcus pentosaceus, Leuconostoc holzapfelii, Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus vaginalis, Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus graminis and Weissella cibaria. In general, the composition of the stable biota was strongly affected by the fermentation conditions, whilst Lactobacillus plantarum dominated in all buckwheat sourdoughs. Lactobacillus pontis is described for the first time as dominant species in teff sourdough. Among yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata dominated teff sourdoughs, whereas the solely Kazachstania barnetti was isolated in buckwheat sourdough developed under condition A. This study allowed the identification and isolation of LAB and yeasts species which are highly competitive during fermentation of buckwheat or teff flours. Representatives of these species can be selected as starters for the production of sourdough destined to GF bread production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.016

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teff is traditionally naturally fermented by saving part of the liquid that forms at the top of the fermentation vessel (ersho) to start a new fermentation process driven by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes.

    “Teff is traditionally naturally fermented by saving part of the liquid that forms at the top of the fermentation vessel (ersho) to start a new fermentation process driven by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes.50,51,52”
  • LAB belonging to the former genus Lactobacillus and genus Pediococcus are commonly found in different teff sourdoughs.

    “While lactic acid bacteria (LAB) belonging to the former genus Lactobacillus and genus Pediococcus are commonly found in different teff sourdoughs,50,51”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moroni, A. V., Arendt, E. K., & Bello, F. D.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Arendt, Elke K.
Venue
Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
497-502
ISSN
0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005826058
Cited by
163
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Food Institutional Research Measure
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
sourdough, buckwheat, Eragrostis tef, gluten-free bread, spontaneous fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, yeast, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus pontis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria, fermentation conditions, backslopping
MeSH terms
Bread, Fermentation, Flour, Food Microbiology, Humans, Lactobacillaceae, Species Specificity, Yeasts, Colony Count, Microbial, Fagopyrum, Eragrostis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review