The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radical scavenging activity of various extracts and fractions of sweet orange peel (Citrus sinensis)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and health benefits of citrus peel
Singh, B., Singh, J. P., Kaur, A., & Singh, N. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109114 · Cited by 711
Pinelo, M., Arnous, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2006) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.05.003 · Cited by 559
Valorisation of citrus processing waste: a review
Zema, D. A., Calabrò, P. S., Folino, A., Tamburino, V., Zappia, G., & Zimbone, S. M. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.024 · Cited by 503
Garau, M. C., Simal, S., Rosselló, C., & Femenia, A. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.009 · Cited by 468
A comprehensive review on flavanones, the major citrus polyphenols
Khan, M. K., Zill-E-Huma, & Dangles, O. (2014) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2013.11.004 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Anagnostopoulou, M. A., Kefalas, P., Papageorgiou, V. P., Assimopoulou, A. N., & Boskou, D.
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-25
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054363550
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radical scavenging activity of various extracts and fractions of sweet orange peel (Citrus sinensis). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.047
- The paper
- Anagnostopoulou, M. A., Kefalas, P., Papageorgiou, V. P., Assimopoulou, A. N., & Boskou, D. (2006). Radical scavenging activity of various extracts and fractions of sweet orange peel (Citrus sinensis). Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
