Cited by 49Arsenic contamination and mitigationAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFood and Agricultural Sciences

Inorganic Arsenic in Seafood: Does the Extraction Method Matter?

Pétursdóttir, Ásta H., Gunnlaugsdóttir, Helga, Krupp, Eva M., Feldmann, Jörg·2014·Food Chemistry

Abstract

Nine different extraction methods were evaluated for three seafood samples to test whether the concentration of inorganic arsenic (iAs) determined in seafood is dependent on the extraction method. Certified reference materials (CRM) DOLT-4 (Dogfish Liver) and TORT-2 (Lobster Hepatopancreas), and a commercial herring fish meal were evaluated. All experimental work described here was carried out by the same operator using the same instrumentation, thus eliminating possible differences in results caused by laboratory related factors. Low concentrations of iAs were found in CRM DOLT-4 (0.012±0.003mgkg(-1)) and the herring fish meal sample (0.007±0.002mgkg(-1)) for all extraction methods. When comparing the concentration of iAs in CRM TORT-2 found in this study and in the literature dilute acids, HNO3 and HCl, showed the highest extracted iAs wheras dilute NaOH (in 50% ethanol) showed significantly lower extracted iAs. However, most other extraction solvents were not statistically different from one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.005

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pétursdóttir, Á. H., Gunnlaugsdóttir, H., Krupp, E. M., & Feldmann, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Matís (Iceland) (IS)
Corresponding author
Feldmann, Jörg
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
150
Pages
353-359
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074318064
Cited by
48
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Icelandic Centre for Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
inorganic arsenic, seafood, sample extraction methods, extraction solvent comparison, certified reference materials, lobster hepatopancreas, acid extraction, sodium hydroxide extraction, arsenic determination
MeSH terms
Animals, Arsenic, Food Contamination, Chemical Fractionation, Seafood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review