Impact of structural characteristics on starch digestibility of cooked rice
Abstract
To examine the impact of structural characteristics of cooked rice grains on their starch digestibility, a simulated in vitro gastro-small intestinal digestion technique was applied to intact and homogenised cooked rice samples. The starch hydrolysis percentage increased during simulated small intestinal digestion, in which approximately 65% and 24% of the starch was hydrolysed within the first 5min, for homogenised and intact cooked rice, respectively. The kinetic constant of homogenised cooked rice, which was regarded as an estimated digestion rate, was ∼8 times higher than the intact cooked rice. The homogenised and intact samples were also examined for any microstructural changes occurring during the in vitro digestion process using fluorescent and scanning electron microscopy. In the intact samples, the aleurone layers of the endosperm remained as thin-film like layers during in vitro digestion and thus may be regarded as less digestible materials that influence cooked rice digestibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extent of digestion, and thus the glycaemic response, are determined by the particle size of the food, the cooking method, the size of the mouthful, the extent of chewing and digestion that takes place in the mouth, and the physical and chemical properties of the starch.
“The extent of digestion, and thus the glycaemic response, are determined by the particle size of the food, the cooking method, the size of the mouthful, the extent of chewing and digestion that takes place in the mouth, and the physical and chemical properties of the starch [8,9].”
From Effect of Cold Storage and Reheating of Parboiled Rice on Postprandial Glycaemic Response, Satiety, Palatability and Chewed Particle Size Distribution (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lu, L., Venn, B., Lu, J., Monro, J., & Rush, E. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9050475 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“The extent of digestion, and thus the glycaemic response, are determined by the particle size of the food, the cooking method, the size of the mouthful, the extent of chewing and digestion that takes place in the mouth, and the physical and chemical properties of the starch [8,9].”
Background
- Authors
- Tamura, M., Singh, J., Kaur, L., & Ogawa, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chiba University (JP)
- Riddet Institute (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Ogawa, Yukiharu
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 91-97
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034545528
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Foundation for Research Science and Technology (MAUX0703)
- Chiba University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
- Keywords
- cooked rice, starch digestibility, rice grain structure, aleurone layer, starch hydrolysis, digestion rate
- MeSH terms
- Cooking, Hydrolysis, Kinetics, Particle Size, Oryza, Starch, Endosperm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review