Cited by 132Food composition and propertiesProteins in Food SystemsPhytase and its Applications

Impact of structural characteristics on starch digestibility of cooked rice

Tamura, Masatsugu, Singh, Jaspreet, Kaur, Lovedeep, Ogawa, Yukiharu·2016·Food Chemistry

Abstract

To examine the impact of structural characteristics of cooked rice grains on their starch digestibility, a simulated in vitro gastro-small intestinal digestion technique was applied to intact and homogenised cooked rice samples. The starch hydrolysis percentage increased during simulated small intestinal digestion, in which approximately 65% and 24% of the starch was hydrolysed within the first 5min, for homogenised and intact cooked rice, respectively. The kinetic constant of homogenised cooked rice, which was regarded as an estimated digestion rate, was ∼8 times higher than the intact cooked rice. The homogenised and intact samples were also examined for any microstructural changes occurring during the in vitro digestion process using fluorescent and scanning electron microscopy. In the intact samples, the aleurone layers of the endosperm remained as thin-film like layers during in vitro digestion and thus may be regarded as less digestible materials that influence cooked rice digestibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent of digestion, and thus the glycaemic response, are determined by the particle size of the food, the cooking method, the size of the mouthful, the extent of chewing and digestion that takes place in the mouth, and the physical and chemical properties of the starch.

    “The extent of digestion, and thus the glycaemic response, are determined by the particle size of the food, the cooking method, the size of the mouthful, the extent of chewing and digestion that takes place in the mouth, and the physical and chemical properties of the starch [8,9].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamura, M., Singh, J., Kaur, L., & Ogawa, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Riddet Institute (NZ)
Corresponding author
Ogawa, Yukiharu
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
191
Pages
91-97
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034545528
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for Research Science and Technology (MAUX0703)
  • Chiba University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
Keywords
cooked rice, starch digestibility, rice grain structure, aleurone layer, starch hydrolysis, digestion rate
MeSH terms
Cooking, Hydrolysis, Kinetics, Particle Size, Oryza, Starch, Endosperm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review