Cited by 72Analytical chemistry methods developmentElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of cadmium and lead at sub-ppt level in soft drinks: An efficient combination between dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Open access
Mandlate, Jaime S., Soares, Bruno M., Seeger, Tassia S., Vecchia, Paula Dalla, Mello, Paola A., Flores, Erico M.M., Duarte, Fabio A.·2017·Food Chemistry

Abstract

A DLLME method for extraction and preconcentration of Cd and Pb from soft drinks and further determination by GF AAS was developed. Important parameters of DLLME such as the type and volume of dispersive and extraction solvents, concentration of DDTC (complexing agent) and pH were evaluated. Better results were obtained using 500μL of acetone for Cd and 700μL of acetonitrile for Pb as dispersive solvents, 60μL of CCl 4 as extraction solvent for both analytes and 500μL of 1.5% DDTC solution. Accuracy was evaluated by recovery assays and ranged from 91 to 113% for Cd and from 95 to 108% for Pb, with RSD below 10 and 7%, respectively. The LODs were 0.006 and 0.072ngL-1 for Cd and Pb, respectively. The optimized method was applied for the determination of Cd and Pb in soft drinks with different brands and flavours.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.075

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Metadata

Authors
Mandlate, J. S., Soares, B. M., Seeger, T. S., Vecchia, P. D., Mello, P. A., Flores, E. M. M., & Duarte, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
221
Pages
907-912
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550175728
Cited by
72
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
cadmium, lead, soft drinks, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, preconcentration, trace metal analysis, food contamination
MeSH terms
Cadmium, Carbonated Beverages, Food Contamination, Graphite, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review