Cited by 56Analytical chemistry methods developmentMelamine detection and toxicityPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An air-assisted dispersive liquid phase microextraction method based on a hydrophobic magnetic deep eutectic solvent for the extraction and preconcentration of melamine from milk and milk-based products

Elik, Adil, Fesliyan, Seçkin, Gürsoy, Nevcihan, Haq, Hameed Ul, Castro-Muñoz, Roberto, Altunay, Nail·2023·Food Chemistry

Abstract

In the current research, a fast and sustainable air-assisted hydrophobic magnetic deep eutectic solvent-based dispersive liquid phase microextraction followed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry measurements was optimized for the extraction and determination of melamine in milk and milk-based products. The central composite design was applied for the optimization of factors affecting the recovery of melamine. Quantitative extraction of melamine was achieved using hydrophobic magnetic deep eutectic solvents prepared from a mixture of octanoic acid, aliquat-336, and cobalt(II) chloride. The optimum conditions for extraction were found as follows: 6 extraction cycles, pH 8.2, extraction solvent volume 260 µL, and acetone volume 125 µL.Interestingly, a centrifugation step was not required to achieve phase separation. Under the optimum conditions, melamine was determined in the linear range of 3-600 ng mL-1, the limit of detection (3S blank/m) of 0.9 ng mL-1, and the enrichment factor of 144. The validation of the method was investigated by the analysis of reference materials. Consequently, the method was successfully applied for the analysis of melamine residues in milk and milk-based products.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136573

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elik, A., Fesliyan, S., Gürsoy, N., Haq, H. U., Castro-Muñoz, R., & Altunay, N.
Affiliations
  • Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Altunay, Nail
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
426
Pages
136573
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380363404
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 5
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Melamine detection and toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
melamine, milk, dairy products, deep eutectic solvents, melamine residues, food contaminant analysis, octanoic acid, Aliquat 336, cobalt chloride, preconcentration
MeSH terms
Deep Eutectic Solvents, Animals, Milk, Solvents, Triazines, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction, Magnetic Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review