Cited by 6Analytical chemistry methods developmentIonic liquids properties and applicationsMelamine detection and toxicity

A Sustainable Supramolecular Deep Eutectic Solvent System for Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by HPLC for the Determination of Melamine in Milk Samples

Open access
Sadek, Modar, Sarkis, Nazira, Jangi, George·2026·Results in Chemistry

Abstract

This work presents the development and application of an innovative green supramolecular deep eutectic solvent (SUPRADES)-based DLLME approach for the extraction and quantification of melamine in milk matrices. For this purpose, thymol and nonanoic acid were combined to create a hydrophobic DES, which was then utilized as the extraction solvent. Additionally, a ternary SUPRADES based on a hydrophilic DES composed of choline chloride and ethylene glycol and doped with β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) was prepared and applied as the disperser solvent. Critical parameters were optimized systematically, yielding the following optimal conditions: Extraction sol v ent volume: 150 μL; disperser solvent: 600 μL; β-CD: 1% ( w / v ); pH: 7; extraction time: 1 min; and sample solution volume: 5 mL. Interestingly, the salting-out step did not affect the extraction efficiency. The optimized approach showed good linearity (100–900 ng/mL) with R 2 = 0.998 when validated with matrix-matched calibration standards. The LOD and LOQ were 27 and 81 ng/mL, respectively, and the enrichment factor was 41. Method accuracy and precision were evaluated through recovery studies using milk samples fortified with melamine at three concentration levels (200, 500, and 800 ng/mL), and the recovery values were obtained in the range of 92–107%, with RSD < 5%. A greenness score of 79 was attained by the method, as quantified by the advanced ComplexMoGAPI. Lastly, this technique was successfully applied to extract and determine melamine in real samples of powdered milk, infant formula, and raw milk with acceptable and satisfactory results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103057

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadek, M., Sarkis, N., & Jangi, G.
Affiliations
University of Aleppo (SY)
Corresponding author
Sadek, Modar
Venue
Results in Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-02
Volume
20
Pages
103057
ISSN
2211-7156 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7119794506
Cited by
5
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Results in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Melamine detection and toxicity
Keywords
melamine, milk, deep eutectic solvents, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, green analytical chemistry, β-cyclodextrin, choline chloride, thymol, nonanoic acid, salting-out, infant formula, raw milk, milk powder, food contaminant analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review