Cited by 6

Comparative behaviours of homogenized amaranth, buckwheat, quinoa submicron protein particles and their effects on physicochemical properties of high internal phase emulsions

Yan, Xinyi, Zhu, Fan·2026·Food Chemistry

Abstract

This study compared six homogenized submicron protein particles (PN) of Amaranthus hypochondriacus (AhPN), A. caudatus (AcPN), common buckwheat (CBPN), Tartary buckwheat (TBPN), white quinoa (WQPN) and red quinoa (RQPN), as stabilizers of high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs) at different oil fractions (φ = 0.75, 0.80, 0.85). The relationships of PN properties and HIPEs stability were analyzed by principal component analysis and Pearson correlations. Amaranth-PN showed higher surface hydrophobicity and contact angle (∼56°). TBPN displayed the highest phenolic content with the strongest antioxidation (DPPH, Fe 2+ ) and the lowest equilibrium interfacial tension (∼9.27 mN/m). CBPN combined relatively small particles and high ζ-potential (-43.5 mV) to form dense interfacial films, yielding high moduli and viscosity, with robust gel-state HIPEs across the oil loadings. Quinoa-PN remained comparatively large particle size with high interfacial tension (∼12 mN/m) after homogenization, which produced no HIPEs at high oil fractions. This study provides direct evaluations of structure-function relationships for pseudocereal stabilizers in HIPEs, offering actionable designs for plant protein-based emulsions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2026.147946

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Globulin-rich and more aggregated isolates are more suited to particle- or network-based stabilization systems, such as Pickering emulsions, HIPEs and emulsion gels, especially after pH-shift, heating, or shear structuring.

    “By contrast, globulin-rich and more aggregated isolates are more suited to particle- or network-based sta­ bilization systems, such as Pickering emulsions, high-internal-phase emulsions (HIPEs) and emulsion gels, especially after pH-shift, heat­ ing, or shear structuring”
  • pH-shift combined with heat or ultrasound, high-pressure homogenization, and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic routes commonly reduce the mean particle size to 0.15-0.5 μm and narrow the size distribution.

    “However, pH-shift combined with heat or ultrasound, high-pressure homogenization, and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic routes commonly reduce the mean particle size to 0.15-0.5 μ m and narrow the size distribution”
  • Common buckwheat is more often discussed in relation to its large particle size and robust gel network formation.

    “Common buckwheat, by contrast, is more often discussed in relation to its large particle size and robust gel network formation (Lin et al., 2025; Yan & Zhu, 2026; Zou et al., 2023).”
  • Controlled aggregation can generate submicron particles or microgels suitable for Pickering-type stabilization.

    “Controlled aggregation can generate submicron particles or microgels suitable for Pickering-type stabilization”
  • In quinoa protein isolates, high-pressure homogenization disrupts large aggregates, reduces particle size from the micro scale to the submicron range, improves water solubility, enhances emulsifying and foaming performance, accelerates surface/interfacial tension reduction, and strengthens heat-induced gels.

    “In quinoa protein isolates, high-pressure homogenization disrupts large aggregates, reduces parti­ cle size from the micro scale to the submicron range, improves water solubility, enhances emulsifying and foaming performance, accelerates surface/interfacial tension reduction, and strengthens heat-induced gels (Yan & Zhu, 2026).”

Authors
Yan, X., & Zhu, F.
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
505
Pages
147946
ISSN
0308-8146
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review