Cited by 152Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyAntimicrobial agents and applications

Flow cytometric assessment of the antimicrobial activity of essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes

Paparella, Antonello, Taccogna, Lorenzo, Aguzzi, Irene, Chaves-López, Clemencia, Serio, Annalisa, Marsilio, Fulvio, Suzzi, Giovanna·2008·Food Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.01.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantification of injured cells has an interesting outcome in food microbiology, as this subpopulation might be critical if cell recovery becomes possible, such as in temperature abuse conditions during food storage.

    “Quantification of injured cells has an interesting outcome in food microbiology, as this subpopulation might be critical if cell recovery becomes possible, such as in temperature abuse conditions during food storage [95].”
  • Several studies reported the effectiveness of flow cytometer as a tool for antibacterial testing of essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes, using combined staining with PI for membrane damage evaluation and cFDA for esterase activity detection.

    “Several studies were reported on the effectiveness of flow cytometer as a tool for antibacterial testing of essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes, using combined staining with PI for membrane damage evaluation and carboxyfluorescein diacetate (cFDA) for esterase activity detection [95].”
  • Many authors investigated the antibacterial and antifungal activities of many drugs using flow cytometry.

    “Thus, many authors investigated the antibacterial and antifungal activities of many drugs using this methodology [95], [96], [97], [98].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paparella, A., Taccogna, L., Aguzzi, I., Chaves-López, C., Serio, A., Marsilio, F., & Suzzi, G.
Affiliations
University of Teramo (IT)
Corresponding author
Paparella, Antonello
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1174-1182
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051236163
Cited by
152
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Control (publishedVersion)
  • UniTERAMO Research Catalog (University of Teramo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
Listeria monocytogenes, essential oils, oregano essential oil, thyme essential oil, cinnamon essential oil, antimicrobial activity, membrane damage, sublethal stress, propidium iodide staining, NaCl concentration, mechanism of action, foodborne pathogen inactivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review