Cited by 62Probiotics and Fermented FoodsFermentation and Sensory AnalysisEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Appraisal of lactic acid bacteria as protective cultures

Varsha, Kontham Kulangara, Nampoothiri, Kesavan Madhavan·2016·Food Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.032

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varsha, K. K., & Nampoothiri, K. M.
Affiliations
National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Nampoothiri, Kesavan Madhavan
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
69
Pages
61-64
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343706047
Cited by
62
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Control (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
  • CSIR Net work (CSC0133)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, protective cultures, biopreservatives, antimicrobial peptides, phenolic compounds, fungal contamination, food spoilage, mycotoxin removal, sourdough, antioxidant activity, food safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review