Cited by 123Proteins in Food SystemsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFood composition and properties

Pepsin diffusivity in whey protein gels and its effect on gastric digestion

Open access
Luo, Qi, Borst, Jan Willem, Westphal, Adrie H., Boom, Remko M., Janssen, Anja E.M.·2017·Food Hydrocolloids

Abstract

Protein is essential to human health, but its digestion kinetics in varied structures are not yet well understood. We previously found different kinetics of protein hydrolysis in solution and in gels, and we hypothesized that the difference stemmed from the steric hindrance of gel structure to the diffusion of pepsin and its hydrolysates. To better understand the pepsin diffusivity in food matrices and its effect on digestion, we determined the diffusivity of pepsin in water and in whey protein isolate (WPI) gels by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). We estimated the pepsin concentration gradient during digestion based on the determined diffusivity, which showed that the pepsin is constrained within a thin layer from the gel surface. Gel composition analysis confirmed this constraint: peptides as protein fragments were observed only in the first 2 mm of the WPI gels after 6 h of in vitro gastric digestion. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that pepsin loosened the microstructure of whey protein gel surfaces, which may accelerate pepsin diffusion and consequently gel surface disintegration. We conclude that the mode of whey protein gel digestion is determined by the summed effect of diffusion limitation, hydrolysis rate and microstructure transformation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.11.046

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased gel texture at higher protein content delayed gastric empty and breakdown of gels during digestion, further reducing digestibility.

    “Increased gel texture at higher protein content delayed the gastric empty and the breakdown of gels during digestion, further reducing digestibility.”

    From Designing Protein Gels for Nutrient Delivery: From Formulation to Digestion (2026) · cites this paper as Luo et al. 2017

    The available passages labeled Abstract (no page given) contain bibliographic information and keywords, but no findings about protein content, gel texture, gastric emptying, gel breakdown, or digestibility. Searches for those terms returned no passage that addresses the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Denser microstructure and less porosity of protein gels could delay diffusion of pepsin into gel matrix, showing slower protein hydrolysis.

    “The denser microstructure and less porosity of protein gels could delay the diffusion of pepsin into gel matrix, showing slower protein hydrolysis (Luo et al. 2017; Opazo‐Navarrete et al. 2018).”

    From Designing Protein Gels for Nutrient Delivery: From Formulation to Digestion (2026) · cites this paper as Luo et al. 2017

    The available indexed passages identify a paper about pepsin diffusivity in whey protein gels, but contain no results or discussion establishing that denser, less porous gels delay pepsin diffusion and slow hydrolysis. Searches for microstructure, porosity, diffusion, and hydrolysis returned only bibliographic text (no section or page available). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, Q., Borst, J. W., Westphal, A. H., Boom, R. M., & Janssen, A. E. M.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Anja E.M.
Venue
Food Hydrocolloids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
66
Pages
318-325
ISSN
0268-005X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558991208
Cited by
123
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Hydrocolloids (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
gastric digestion, steric hindrance, diffusion limitation, gel microstructure, in vitro digestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review