Cited by 77Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

Water absorption as a prediction tool for the application of hydrocolloids in potato starch-based bread

Open access
Horstmann, S.W., Axel, C., Arendt, E.K.·2018·Food Hydrocolloids

Abstract

To create visco-elastic networks in gluten-free doughs, hydrocolloids have been used most commonly to compensate for the lack of gluten. This study applies a prediction tool in form of an equation, considering the right water absorption level, to obtain optimised conditions for the use of six different hydrocolloids (guar gum, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, locust bean gum, pectin, sodium alginate, xanthan gum). For this purpose, the water holding capacity of each hydrocolloid was determined and the water amount in the formulation was adjusted accordingly to it. The hydrocolloids were analysed in five concentrations (0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2.0%). Analysis of water adjusted doughs included rheological properties, pasting properties and the baking performance. With the aid of the prediction tool, it was possible to obtain bread-like products for each hydrocolloid. However, the various hydrocolloids showed different concentration levels, where they performed best. In this study, the main influencing factors on bread quality were linked to the charge and the molecular weight of the various hydrocolloids. The negative charge of some hydrocolloids was hypothesised to created repelling forces between it and the negatively charged phosphate groups of potato starches, affected those parameters. Bread baked with sodium alginate reached the highest specific volume at a concentration level of 1% and 2% xanthan gum had the softest breadcrumb. Based on the source of used hydrocolloid, the analysis of the rheological and pasting properties revealed connections between dough properties and bread quality parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.045

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horstmann, S. W., Axel, C., & Arendt, E. K.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Arendt, E.K.
Venue
Food Hydrocolloids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
81
Pages
129-138
ISSN
0268-005X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793584478
Cited by
77
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Hydrocolloids (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (635727)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
hydrocolloids, gluten-free bread, potato starch, water absorption, water holding capacity, sodium alginate, xanthan gum, guar gum, locust bean gum, pectin, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, dough rheology, pasting properties, baking performance, specific volume, molecular weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review